Can national e-government standards find acceptance?

Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Veit, Daniel J ^a   Parasie, Nils P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

E GOVERNMENTS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; EUROPEAN STANDARDS; INTEROPERABLE SERVICES; PUBLIC PROCUREMENTS; SHARP CONTRASTS; SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS;

STANDARDS;

EID: 63349095546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2009.103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Accenture, "Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences", http://www.accenture.com/xdoc/ca/locations/canada/insights/ studies/leadership-cust.pdf, 2005, access date: 05/27/2008.
2. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Algermissen, L., Delfmann, P., and Falk, T., "eGovernment Success Factors", in: EGOV 2004, R. Traunmüller (ed.), Springer, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 503?506.
3. Bozeman, B., and Bretschneider, S., "Public Management Information Systems: Theory and Prescription", Public Administration Review, vol. 46: Special Issue: Public Management Information Systems, 1986, pp. 475-487.
4. Bretschneider, S., "Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test", Public Administration Review, vol. 50: 5, 1990, pp. 536-545.
5. Capgemini, "Online Availability of Public Services: How is Europe Progressing?", http://ec.europa.eu/information-society/eeurope/i2010/docs/ benchmarking/online-availability-2006.pdf, 2006, access date: 05/27/2008.
6. Cronbach, L.J., "Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests", Psychometrika, vol. 16: 3, 1951, pp. 297-333.
7. Davenport, T.H., "Putting the Enterprise Into the Enterprise System", Harvard Business Review., vol. 76: 4, 1998.
8. European Commission, "Architecture Guidelines - For Trans-European Telematics Networks for Administrations", http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/ servlets/Doc?id=19280, IDABC, 2004, access date: 05/27/2008.
9. European Commission, "European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services", http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc? id=19529, IDABC, 2004, access date: 05/27/2008.
10. Farrell, J., and Saloner, G., "Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation", The American Economic Review, vol. 76, 1986, pp. 940-955.
11. German Federal Ministry of the Interior, "Standards and Architectures for eGovernment Applications", http://www.kbst.bund.de/cln- 012/nn-837392/SharedDocs/Anlagen-kbst/Saga/saga-3-0-en.html-nnn=true, Federal Government Co-ordination and Advisory Agency for IT in the Federal Administration, 2006, access date: 06/14/2008.
12. Guijarro, L., "Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States", Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24: 1, 2007, pp. 89-101.
13. Jinyoul, L., Keng, S., and Soongoo, H., "Enterprise integration with ERP and EAI", Communications of the ACM, vol. 46: 2, 2003, pp. 54-60.
14. Joumard, I., Kongsrud, P.M., Nam, Y.-S., and Price, R., "Enhancing the Cost Effectiveness of Public Spending -Experience in OECD Countries", OECD Economic Studies, vol. 37, 2003, pp. 109-161.
15. Katz, M.L., and Shapiro, C., "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility", The American Economic Review, vol. 75, 1985, pp. 424-440.
16. Klischewski, R., "Information Integration or Process Integration? How to Achieve Interoperability in Administration", in: Electronic Government, Springer, Berlin et al., 2004, pp. 57-65.
17. Lemke, H., "Bessere IT-Governance durch mehr Bundeszustä ndigkeit? (in German)", eGovernment Computing, vol. 5-2008, 2008, p. 3.
18. Likert, R., "A technique for the measurement of attitudes", Archives of Psychology, vol. No. 140, 1932.
19. Linthicum, D.S., Enterprise Application Integration Addison-Wesley, Boston et al., 2000.
20. Parasie, N., and Veit, D., "Nationale E-Government Standards - Mehr Interoperabilität durch zentrale Richtlinien?" in: Proceedings of the Multi-Conference Information Systems (Multikonferenz Wirtschafts-informatik, in German), Munich, 2008.
21. Scharpf, F.W., "The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited", Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 44, 2006, pp. 845-864.
22. Scholl, H.J., "Interoperability in e-Government: More than Just Smart Middleware", in: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2005.
23. Shapiro, C., and Varian, H.R., Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Havard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1999.
24. Tschichholz, M., and Fox, O., "Dienste statt Software -Architekturen für prozessorientiertes E-Government", in: Handbuch E-Government - Strategien, Lösungen und Wirtschaftlichkeit (in German), A. Zechner (ed.), Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007.
25. United Nations, "UN Government Survey 2008: From E-Government to Connected Governance", http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/un/unpan028607.pdf, 2008, access date: 05/27/2008.
26. US Office of Management and Budget, "FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document", http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/documents/FEA-CRM-v20- Final-June-2006.pdf, Office of E-Government and Information Technology, 2006, access date: 05/27/2008.
27. West, D.M., Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford, 2005.
28. Willis, G.B., Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2005.
29. World Trade Organization, "The plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement", http://www.wto.org/english/docs-e/legal-e/gpr-94-e.pdf, GPA, 1994, access date: 06/06/2008.