Discrimination of 'San Marzano' accessions: A comparison of minisatellite, CAPS and SSR markers in relation to morphological traits

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 560-564

  Caramante, Martina ^a   Rao, Rosa ^a   Monti, Luigi Maria ^a   Corrado, Giandomenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

GATA; Genetic distance; Microsatellite; Morphological analysis; SNP; Tomato

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTIVATION; GENETIC MARKER; MORPHOLOGY; VEGETABLE;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 63249112627     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andreakis N., Giordano I., Pentangelo A., Fogliano V., Graziani G., Monti L.M., and Rao R. DNA fingerprinting and quality traits of corbarino cherry-like tomato landraces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52 (2004) 3366-3371
2. Bredemeijer G.M.M., Arens P., Wouters D., Visser D., and Vosman B. The use of semi-automated fluorescent microsatellite analysis for tomato cultivar identification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97 (1998) 584-590
3. Cooke R.J., Bredemeijer G.M.M., Ganal M.W., Peeters R., Isaac P., Rendell S., Jackson J., Roder M.S., Korzun V., Wendehake K., Areshchenkova T., Dijcks M., Laborie D., Bertrand L., and Vosman B. Assessment of the uniformity of wheat and tomato varieties at DNA microsatellite loci. Euphytica 132 (2003) 331-341
4. Dice L.R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology (1945) 297-302
5. Grandillo S., and Tanksley S.D. Genetic analysis of RFLPs, GATA, microsatellites and RAPDs in a cross between L. esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92 (1996) 957-965
6. He C., Poysa V., and Yu K. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106 (2003) 363-373
7. Kaemmer D., Weising K., Beyermann B., Borner T., Epplen J.T., and Kahl G. Oligonucleotide fingerprinting of tomato DNA. Plant Breeding 114 (1995) 12-17
8. Loiudice R., Impembo M., Laratta B., Villari G., Lovoi A., Siviero P., and Castaldo D. Composition of San Marzano tomato varieties. Food Chemistry 53 (1995) 81-89
9. Mantel N.A. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research (1967) 209-220
10. Martinez I., Aursand M., Erikson U., Singstad T.E., Veliyulin E., and van der Zwaag C. Destructive and non-destructive analytical techniques for authentication and composition analyses of foodstuffs. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14 (2003) 489-498
11. Mazzucato A., Papa R., Bitocchi E., Mosconi P., Nanni L., Negri V., Picarella M.E., Siligato F., Soressi G.P., Tiranti B., and Veronesi F. Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 116 (2008) 657-669
12. Melchiade D., Foroni I., Corrado G., Santangelo I., and Rao R. Authentication of the 'Annurca' apple in agro-food chain by amplification of microsatellite loci. Food Biotechnology 21 (2007) 33-43
13. Miller J.C., and Tanksley S.D. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic-relationships and genetic-variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80 (1990) 437-448
14. Monti L.M., Santangelo E., Corrado G., Rao R., Soressi G.P., and Scarascia Mugnozza G.T. Il 'San Marzano': Problematiche e prospettive in relazione alla sua salvaguardia e alla necessità di interventi genetici. Agroindustria 3 (2004) 161-170
15. 4 DNA fingerprinting identifies morphologically characterized 'San Marzano' tomato plants. Plant Breeding 125 (2006) 173-176
16. Rohlf, F., 1998. Ntsyspc Version 2.0: User Guide. Applied Biostatistics.
17. Ruiz J.J., Garcia-Martinez S., Pico B., Gao M.Q., and Quiros C.F. Genetic variability and relationship of closely related spanish traditional cultivars of tomato as detected by SRAP and SSR markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 130 (2005) 88-94
18. Sambrook J., Fritsh E.F., and Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. (1989), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
19. Schlotterer C. The evolution of molecular markers-just a matter of fashion?. Nature Reviews Genetics 5 (2004) 63-69
20. Smulders M.J.M., Bredemeijer G., RusKortekaas W., Arens P., and Vosman B. Use of short microsatellites from database sequences to generate polymorphisms among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars and accessions of other Lycopersicon species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94 (1997) 264-272
21. Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy Freeman, San Francisco.
22. Vosman B., Arens P., Ruskortekaas W., and Smulders M.J.M. Identification of highly polymorphic DNA regions in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 85 (1992) 239-244
23. Williamson V.M., Ho J.Y., Wu F.F., Miller N., and Kaloshian I. A PCR-based marker tightly linked to the nematode resistance gene, Mi, in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87 (1994) 757-763
24. Yang W.C., Bai X.D., Kabelka E., Eaton C., Kamoun S., van der Knaap E., and Francis D. Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags. Molecular Breeding 14 (2004) 21-34