Estimating the spatial scale of herbicide and soil interactions by nested sampling, hierarchical analysis of variance and residual maximum likelihood

Environmental Pollution

Volumn 157, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1689-1696

  Price, Oliver R ^a,b   Oliver, Margaret A ^b   Walker, Allan ^a   Wood, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Degradation; Herbicide; Sorption; Spatial variation

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION RATES; FIELD-SCALE; HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS; ISOPROTURON; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS; RESIDUAL MAXIMUM LIKELIHOODS; SAMPLING DESIGNS; SAMPLING INTERVALS; SOIL INTERACTIONS; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER CONTENTS; SOIL SAMPLES; SPATIAL SCALE; SPATIAL STRUCTURES; SPATIAL VARIATION; VARIOGRAM;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMASS; BLOCK CODES; DEGRADATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS; SORPTION; WEED CONTROL;

HERBICIDES;

HERBICIDE; ISOPROTURON; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER;

DEGRADATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; HERBICIDE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; SOIL QUALITY; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; SAMPLING; SOIL POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL SOIL VARIABILITY;

ADSORPTION; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOMASS; HERBICIDES; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PARTICLE SIZE; PHENYLUREA COMPOUNDS; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS;

EID: 63249107454     PISSN: 02697491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bailey G.W., and White J.L. Factors influencing adsorption, desorption and movement of pesticides in soils. Research Review 32 (1970) 29-32
2. Bending G.D., Shaw E., and Walker A. Spatial heterogeneity in the metabolism and dynamics of isoproturon degrading microbial communities in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 33 (2001) 484-489
3. Bending G.D., Lincoln S.D., Sørensen S.R., Morgan J.A.W., Aamand J., and Walker A. In-field spatial variability in the degradation of the phenyl-urea herbicide isoproturon is the result of interactions between degradative Sphingomonas spp. and soil pH. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (2003) 827-834
4. Bending G.D., Lincoln S.D., and Edmondson R.N. Spatial variation in the degradation rate of the pesticides isoproturon, azoxystrobin and diflufenican in soil and its relationship with chemical and microbial properties. Environmental Pollution 139 (2006) 279-287
5. Blair A.M., Martin T.D., Walker A., and Welch S.J. Measurement and prediction of isoproturon movement and persistence in three soils. Crop Protection 9 (1990) 289-294
6. Cleveland C.B. Mobility assessment of agrochemicals: current laboratory methodology and suggestions for future directions. Weed Technology 10 (1996) 157-168
7. Cooke C.M., Shaw G., and Collins C.D. Determination of solid liquid partition coefficients (K-d) for the herbicides isoproturon and trifluralin in five UK agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution 132 (2004) 541-552
8. Coquet Y. Variation of pesticide sorption isotherm in soil at the catchment scale. Pest Management Science 58 (2002) 69-78
9. Cox L., Walker A., and Welch S.J. Evidence for the enhanced biodegradation of isoproturon in soils. Pesticide Science 48 (1996) 253-260
10. Dubus I.G., Brown C.D., and Beulke S. Sensitivity analyses for leaching models used for pesticide registration in Europe. Pest Management Science 59 9 (2003) 962-982
11. FOCUS, 2000. FOCUS groundwater scenarios in the EU review of active substances. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference Sanco/321/2000 rev.2, 202 pp.
12. Fournier J.C., Soulas G., and Catroux G. Degradation microbienne de l'isoproturon dans des modeles de laboratoire. Chemosphere 4 (1975) 207-214
13. Hance R.J. The adsorption of urea and some of its derivatives by a variety of soils. Weed Research 5 (1965) 98-107
14. Hassett J.J., and Banwart W.L. The sorption of nonpolar organics by soils and sediments. In: Sawhney B.L., and Brown K. (Eds). Reactions and Movement of organic chemicals in Soils. SSSA Book Series No 22 (1989), Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, WI 31-44
15. Jenkinson D.S., and Powlson D.S. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 8 (1976) 209-213
16. Karpouzas D.G., Walker A., Drennan D.S.H., and Froud-Williams R.J. The effect of initial concentration of carbofuran on the development and stability of its enhanced biodegradation in top-soil and sub-soil. Pest Management Science 57 (2001) 72-81
17. Kerry R., and Oliver M.A. Comparing sampling requirements for variograms of soil properties computed by the method of moments and residual maximum likelihood. Geoderma 140 (2007) 383-396
18. Lennartz B. Variation of herbicide transport parameters within a single field and its relation to water flux and soil properties. Geoderma 91 (1999) 327-345
19. Luscombe B.M. The influence of rainfall and temperature on the persistence of autumn-applied triallate and isoproturon in the 1979/1980 and 1980/1981 seasons. Aspects of Applied Biology 4 (1983) 423-433
20. Mele P.M., and Carter M.R. Estimation of microbial biomass by ninhydrin-reactive N using liquid chloroform. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76 (1996) 37-40
21. Miesch A.T. Variograms and variance components in geochemistry and ore evaluation. Geological Society of America Memoir 142 (1975) 333-340
22. Mudd P.J., Hance R.J., and Wright S.J.L. The persistence and metabolism of isoproturon in soil. Weed Research 23 (1983) 239-246
23. Novak J.M., Moorman T.B., and Cambardella C.A. Atrazine sorption at the field scale in relation to soils and landscape position. Journal of Environmental Quality 26 (1997) 1271-1277
24. OECD. Test no. 106: Adsorption-desorption using a batch equilibrium method (1997), OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France
25. Oliver M.A., and Webster R. Combining nested and linear sampling for determining the scale and form of spatial variation of regionalized variables. Geographical Analysis 18 (1986) 227-242
26. Oliver M.A., Simmonds L.P., and Wood M. Use of geostatistics to determine spatial variation in pesticide leaching - preliminary findings. Proceedings of XI Symposium Pesticide Chemistry (1999) 551-559
27. Payne, R.W., Murray, D.A., Harding, S.A., Baird, D.B., Soutar, D.M., 2007. GenStat for Windows, tenth ed. Introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead.
28. Rao P.S.C., and Wagenet R.J. Spatial variability of pesticides in field soils: methods for data analysis and consequences. Weed Science 33 (1985) 18
29. Ross G.J.S. Non-linear Estimation (1991), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York
30. Rowell D.L. Soil Science: Methods and Applications (1994), Longman Group UK Limited, Essex, England
31. Scow K.M., and Hutson J. Effect of diffusion and sorption on the kinetics of biodegradation - theoretical considerations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56 (1992) 119-127
32. SETAC. Procedures for Assessing the Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity of Pesticides. ISBN 90-5607-002 9 (1995), Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Brussels, Belgium pp. 1-54
33. Spark K.M., and Swift R.S. Effect of soil composition and dissolved organic matter on pesticide sorption. Science of the Total Environment 298 (2002) 147-161
34. Tomlin C.D.S. The Pesticide Manual. twelfth ed. (2000), British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey
35. Walker A., and Brown P.A. Spatial variability in herbicide degradation rates and residues in soil. Crop Protection 2 (1983) 17-25
36. Walker A., Jurado-Exposito M., Bending G.D., and Smith V.J.R. Spatial variability in the degradation rate of isoproturon in soil. Environmental Pollution 111 (2001) 407-415
37. Walker A., Bromilow R.H., Nicholls P.H., Evans A.A., and Smith V.J.R. Spatial variability in the degradation rates of isoproturon and chlorotoluron in a clay soil. Weed Research 42 (2002) 39-44
38. Wauchope R.D., Yeh S., Linders J.B.H.J., Kloskowski R., Tanaka K., Rubin B., Katayama A., Kordel W., Gerstl Z., Lane M., and Unsworth J.B. Pesticide soil sorption parameters: theory, measurement, uses, limitations and reliability. Pest Management Science 58 (2002) 419-445
39. Webster R., and Oliver M.A. Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. Journal of Soil Science 43 (1992) 177-192
40. Webster R., Welham S.J., Potts J.M., and Oliver M.A. Estimating the spatial scales of regionalized variables by nested sampling, hierarchical analysis of variance and residual maximum likelihood. Computers & Geosciences 32 (2006) 1320-1333
41. Whitfield, W.A.D., 1974. The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21-30.
42. Youden W.J., and Mehlich A. Selection of efficient methods for soil sampling. Contributions of the Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research 9 (1937) 59-70
43. Zander C., Streck T., Kumke T., Altfelder S., and Richter J. Field-scale study of chlortoluron movement in a sandy soil over winter: I. Experiments. Journal of Environmental Quality 28 (1999) 1817-1823