Avoiding an overzealous approach: A perspective on regulatory burden

ILAR Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 426-434

  Haywood, J R ^a   Greene, Molly ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC); Regulations; Regulatory burden; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CARE; ANIMAL WELFARE; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAW; LEADERSHIP; RESEARCH; REVIEW; RISK; SCIENTIST; VETERINARY MEDICINE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; ETHICS; LEGAL ASPECT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL CARE COMMITTEES; ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; HOUSING, ANIMAL;

EID: 63249100334     PISSN: 10842020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ilar.49.4.426     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. AAMC [Association of American Medical Colleges]. 2008. Report on Medical School Faculty Salaries, 2006-2007. Washington: AAMC.
2. AWA [Animal Welfare Act as amended]. 2007. USC Title 7, Chapter 54. Available online (www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-welfare/awa.shtml), accessed June 16, 2008.
3. Banks RE, Norton JN. 2008. A sample postapproval monitoring program in academia. ILAR J 49:402-418.
4. Decker RS, Wimsatt L, Trice AG, Konstan JA. 2007. A Profile of Federal- Grant Administrative Burden among Federal Demonstration Partnership Faculty. Available online (www.thefdp.org/Faculty%20 burden%20survey%20report.pdf), accessed January 25, 2008.
5. FASS [Federation of American Societies of Food Animal Sciences]. 1999. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Savoy IL: FASS.
6. Goldman CA, Williams T, Adamson D, Rosenblatt K. 2000. Paying for University Research Facilities and Administration. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation. Available online (www.rand.org/pubs/ monograph-reports/MR1135-1/ index.html), accessed January 25, 2008.
7. HREA [Health Research Extension Act of 1985]. Animals in Research. Public Law 99-158, November 20, 1985. Available online (http:// grants.nih.gov/grants/ olaw/references/hrea1985.htm), accessed May 28, 2008.
8. Mahoney JD. 1999. NIH Initiative to Reduce Regulatory Burden. Bethesda: NIH Office of the Director. Available online (grants.nih.gov/ grants/policy/regulatoryburden/), accessed January 25, 2008.
9. Millman S. 2007. For the first time in 3 years, faculty salaries beat inflation. Chron Higher Ed 53:A10.
10. NIH [National Institutes of Health]. 2002. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Bethesda: NIH Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW). Available online (http:// grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/ references/phspol.htm#Review%20 of%20PHS- Conducted%20or%20Supported%20Research%20 Projects), accessed May 12, 2008.
11. NIH [National Institutes of Health]. 2007. Frequently Asked Questions (rev. November 6, 2007). Bethesda: Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH, DHHS. Available online (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/ faqs.htm#prorev-1), accessed May 28, 2008.
12. NRC [National Research Council]. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington: National Academy Press.
13. Plante A, James ML. 2008. Program oversight enhancement: The big PAM. ILAR J 49:419-425.
14. Potkay S, DeHaven WR. 2000. OLAW and APHIS: Common areas of noncompliance. Lab Anim 29:32-37.
15. USDA [US Department of Agriculture]. 2000. Policy #12: Consideration of Alternatives to Painful/Distressful Procedures. USDA Animal Care Policy Manual. Available online (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ animal-welfare/downloads/policy/ policy12.pdf), accessed May 12, 2008.
16. USDA [US Department of Agriculture]. 2006. Policy #17: Annual Report for Research Facilities. USDA Animal Care Policy Manual. Available online (www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-welfare/downloads/policy/ policy17.pdf), accessed May 12, 2008.