Provider satisfaction with virtual specialist consultations in a family medicine department

Health Care Manager

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 14-18

  Angstman, Kurt B ^a   Adamson, Steven C ^a   Furst, Joseph W ^a   Houston, Margaret S ^a   Rohrer, James E ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

E medicine; Primary care; Specialty consultation; Telemedicine; Virtual medicine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENERAL PRACTICE; MEDICINE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TELECONSULTATION; TELEMEDICINE;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SPECIALTIES, MEDICAL; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 63249095866     PISSN: 15255794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318196def8     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bergus G, Emerson M, Reed D, Attaluri A. Email teleconsultations: well formulated clinical referrals reduce the need for clinic consultation. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(1):33-38.
2. Keating NL, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. JAMA. 1998;280(10):900-904.
3. Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282(3):261-266.
4. Franks P, Mooney C, Sorbero M. Physician referral rates: style without much substance? Med Care. 2000;38(8):836-846.
5. Franks P, Williams GC, Zwanziger J, Mooney C, Sorbero M. Why do physicians vary so widely in their referral rates? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(3): 163-168.