-
1
-
-
24244444170
-
-
10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492
-
P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958). 10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492
-
(1958)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.109
, pp. 1492
-
-
Anderson, P.W.1
-
2
-
-
0001106221
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1490
-
D. H. Lee and R. Shankar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1490 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1490
-
(1990)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.65
, pp. 1490
-
-
Lee, D.H.1
Shankar, R.2
-
3
-
-
2442430211
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.096401
-
D.-H. Lee and J. M. Leinaas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 096401 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.096401
-
(2004)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.92
, pp. 096401
-
-
Lee, D.-H.1
Leinaas, J.M.2
-
4
-
-
18344376980
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.51.7038
-
S. V. Kravchenko, W. E. Mason, G. E. Bowker, J. E. Furneaux, V. M. Pudalov, and M. D'Iorio, Phys. Rev. B 51, 7038 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.7038
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.51
, pp. 7038
-
-
Kravchenko, S.V.1
Mason, W.E.2
Bowker, G.E.3
Furneaux, J.E.4
Pudalov, V.M.5
D'Iorio, M.6
-
6
-
-
26144433204
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673
-
E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.673
-
(1979)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.42
, pp. 673
-
-
Abrahams, E.1
Anderson, P.W.2
Licciardello, D.C.3
Ramakrishnan, T.V.4
-
7
-
-
6244267394
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.455
-
V. Dobrosavljevic, E. Abrahams, E. Miranda, and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 455 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.455
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.79
, pp. 455
-
-
Dobrosavljevic, V.1
Abrahams, E.2
Miranda, E.3
Chakravarty, S.4
-
8
-
-
6244287238
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.12.3908
-
A. Luther and I. Peschel, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3908 (1975). 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.3908
-
(1975)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.12
, pp. 3908
-
-
Luther, A.1
Peschel, I.2
-
10
-
-
0000959076
-
-
10.1142/S0217979290001121
-
R. Shankar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4, 2371 (1990). 10.1142/ S0217979290001121
-
(1990)
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B
, vol.4
, pp. 2371
-
-
Shankar, R.1
-
11
-
-
0000941582
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1399
-
Y. Imry and S.-K. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1399
-
(1975)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.35
, pp. 1399
-
-
Imry, Y.1
Ma, S.-K.2
-
12
-
-
4243192704
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2503
-
M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2503 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2503
-
(1989)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.62
, pp. 2503
-
-
Aizenman, M.1
Wehr, J.2
-
14
-
-
0003975020
-
-
edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore
-
Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by, A. P. Young, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
-
(1998)
Spin Glasses and Random Fields
-
-
-
15
-
-
0000888388
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1251
-
A. T. Ogielski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1251 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57. 1251
-
(1986)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.57
, pp. 1251
-
-
Ogielski, A.T.1
-
17
-
-
0001261128
-
-
As shown by
-
As shown by L. R. Ford and D. R. Fulkerson, Can. J. Math. 8, 399 (1956), the theorem essentially states that the maximum flow in a network is dictated by its bottleneck
-
(1956)
Can. J. Math.
, vol.8
, pp. 399
-
-
Ford, L.R.1
Fulkerson, D.R.2
-
18
-
-
35949029410
-
-
The analysis of random resistor network of 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612
-
The analysis of random resistor network of V. Ambegaokar, B. I. Halperin, and J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2612 (1971), resembles this theorem. 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.2612
-
(1971)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.4
, pp. 2612
-
-
Ambegaokar, V.1
Halperin, B.I.2
Langer, J.S.3
-
28
-
-
12044256185
-
-
10.1103/RevModPhys.65.1281
-
J. W. Evans, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1281 (1993). 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.1281
-
(1993)
Rev. Mod. Phys.
, vol.65
, pp. 1281
-
-
Evans, J.W.1
-
30
-
-
44949087512
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.228105
-
D. J. Schwab, R. F. Bruinsma, J. Rudnick, and J. Widom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 228105 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.228105
-
(2008)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.100
, pp. 228105
-
-
Schwab, D.J.1
Bruinsma, R.F.2
Rudnick, J.3
Widom, J.4
|