Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan

Studies in Comparative International Development

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 137-161

  Boas, Taylor C ^a   Gans Morse, Jordan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Chile; Concept analysis; Development; Essentially contested concept; Gallie; Germany; Latin America; Neoliberalism; Pinochet; Political economy

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECONOMIC REFORM; NEOLIBERALISM; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

EID: 63149189124     PISSN: 00393606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aguirre Gamio H. Liquidación Histórica del APRA y del Colonialismo Neolibera. Lima: Ediciones Debate; 1962.
2. Allardyce G. What Fascism is Not: Thoughts on the Deflation of a Concept. Am Hist Rev. 1979;84(2):367-8.
3. Aminzade R. From Race to Citizenship: The Indigenization Debate in Post-Socialist Tanzania. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2003;38(1):43-63.
4. Appel H. "International Imperatives and Tax Reform: Lessons from Postcommunist Europe. Comp Polit. 2006;39(1):43-62.
5. Berger P et al. "Cultura y Desarrollo Económico." Estudios Públicos 1990;40:31-66.
6. Boarman PM. Germany's Economic Dilemma: Inflation and the Balance of Payments. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1964.
7. Boeninger E. "Bases de un orden económico para la futura democracia en Chile." Estudios Públicos 1986;22:81-113.
8. Brohman J. Universalism, Eurocentrism, and Ideological Bias in Development Studies: From Modernisation to Neoliberalism. Third World Q. 1995;16(1):122-140.
9. Bullard N, Bello W, Malhotra K. Taming the tigers: The IMF and the Asian crisis. Third World Q. 1998;19(3):505-556.
10. Burns AR. Review of Die Konkurrenz (Untersuchungen uber die Ordnungsprinzipien und Entwicklungstendenzen der Kapitalistischen Verkehrswirtschaft), by Georg Halm. J Polit Econ. 1930;38(4):490-491.
11. Carruthers D. Environmental Politics in Chile: Legacies of Dictatorship and Democracy. Third World Q. 2001;22(3):343-358.
12. Chirinos Soto E. Repercusión política de la inflación. PEC. 1964;80:3-4.
13. Chossudovsky M. The Neo-Liberal Model and the Mechanisms of Economic Repression: The Chilean Case. Co-existence. 1975;12:34-57.
14. Collier D, Mahon JE Jr. Conceptual 'Stretching' Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1993;87(4):845-855.
15. Collier D, Levitsky S. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. World Polit. 1997;49:430-451.
16. Collier D, Levitsky S. "Democracy 'With Adjectives': Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research." Working Paper 230, Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame. 1996.
17. Collier D, Hidalgo FD, Maciuceanu AO. Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications. J Polit Ideol. 2006;11(3):216-246.
18. Echeverría R et al. "Libertad y Coerción: Posiciones socialistas, posiciones liberales." Estudios Públicos 1985;19:91-112.
19. Ffrench-Davis R. El Experimento Monetarista en Chile: Una Síntesis Crítica. Desarrollo Econ. 1983;23(90):163-196.
20. Flisfisch Á, Fontaine A. "El Espíritu del Capitalismo Democrático." Estudios Públicos 1983;11:169-187.
21. Flisfisch Á. "Modelos Conceptuales de la Política." Estudios Públicos 1984;16:161-175.
22. Fontaine AA. Más allá del Leviatán: Hacia el resurgimiento de la libertad individual. Estud Públicos. 1980;1:123-146.
23. Foxley A. Experimentos Neoliberales en América Latina. Colección Estudios CIEPLAN 7. 1982.
24. Freeden M. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
25. Friedman M. "Liberalism, Old Style." Collier's Year Book. New York: P.F. Collier and Son; 1955. p. 360-363.
26. Friedman M. "Neo-liberalism and its Prospects." Milton Friedman Papers, Box 42, Folder 8, Hoover Institution Archives. 1951.
27. Friedman T. "A Manifesto For the Fast World." New York Times Magazine (28 March). 1999.
28. Friedrich CJ. The Political Thought of Neo-Liberalism. The American Political Science Review. 1955;49(2):509-525.
29. Gallie WB. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1956;56:167-198.
30. Gallo E. "Notas sobre el liberalismo clásico." Estudios Públicos 1986;21:243-257.
31. Garand JC, Giles MW. Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2003;36(2):293-308.
32. García Á. "Modelo Neoliberal y Desarrollo Nacional: Un Desencuentro." Estudios Públicos 1983;11:75-90.
33. Gerber D. Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-liberalism, Competition Law, and the 'New' Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law. 1994;42(1):25-84.
34. Gerring J. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
35. Góngora M. Ensayo histórico sobre la noción de estado en Chile en los siglos XIX y XX. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria; 1986.
36. Hall PA, Soskice D, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Hanslowe KL. Neo-Liberalism: An Analysis and Proposed Application. Journal of Public Law. 1960;9(1):96-114.
38. Hull R. "The great lie: Markets, freedom, and knowledge." In: Plehwe D, Walpen B, Neunhöffer G, editors. Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. New York: Routledge; 2006.
39. Irarrázaval I. "Promoción del Desarrollo Social Privado al Nivel Local: Una Propuesta." Estudios Públicos 1990;38:149-192.
40. Irisity J. Uruguay: El fracaso de la opción neo-liberal. Nueva Sociedad. 1975;21:17-37.
41. Johnson C, D'Andrea Tyson L, Zysman J, eds. 1989. Politics and Productivity. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
42. King L. Postcommunist Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of the Transition to Capitalism in Poland and Russia. Studies in Comparative International Development. 2002;37(3):3-34.
43. Kurtz MJ. Chile's Neoliberal Revolution: Incremental Decisions and Structural Transformation. Journal of Latin American Studies. 1999;31(2):399-427.
44. Labarca S. "'Historia Política y Parlamentaria (1891-1920)' de Manuel Rivas Vicuia: 29 Aios de Vida Republicana Evocados en 1.500 Páginas." PEC. 1965;125:10-13.
45. Linz JJ. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 2000. [1974].
46. Lynch N. Neopopulismo: Un concepto vacío. Socialismo y Participación. 1999;86:63-80.
47. Medina E, Arreóla F. "Ludwig Von Mises: La Razón Pura en el Camino de la Libertad." Estudios Públicos 1986;21:185-232.
48. Megay EN. Anti-Pluralist Liberalism: The German Neoliberals. Political Science Quarterly. 1970;85(3):422-442.
49. Oliver HM. German Neoliberals. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1960;74(1):117-149.
50. Orenstein M. Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008.
51. Peña Vial J. "Economía, Positivismo y Moral." Estudios Públicos 1985;20:239-252.
52. Pollack M. The New Right in Chile, 1973-1997. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1999.
53. Ramos JR. Neoconservative economics in the southern cone of Latin America, 1973-1983. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
54. Reitan E. Rape as an Essentially Contested Concept. Hypatia. 2001;16(2):43-66.
55. Riethof M. Labour Involvement in National and Regional Transformation Processes: The Case of Chile. Third World Quarterly. 1999;20(5):1049-1058.
56. Roberts KM. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case. World Politics. 1995;48(1):82-116.
57. Röpke W. "Social-cristianismo y neo-liberalismo." PEC 1964;67: 6-8 and 68: 2-3, 6.
58. Ruiz JM. El Neoliberalismo en América Latina. In: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, editor. Política Econémica y Desarrollo de América Latina. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft GmbH; 1972.
59. Sang Ben M, Van Der Horst A. "Ideales de antaño, necesidades presentes: El liberalismo dominicano como filosofía emergente. In: Levine BB, editor. El Desafío Neoliberal: El Fin del Tercermundismo en América Latina. Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Norma; 1992.
60. Sartori G. Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1970;64:1033-53.
61. Sartori G. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In: Sartori G, editor. Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1984.
62. Schmitter PC. Still the Century of Corporatism? Rev Polit. 1974;36:85-131.
63. Schmitter PC, Lehmbruch Gerhard, editors. Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1979.
64. Seawright J, Collier D. Glossary. In: Brady HE, Collier D, editors. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
65. Shonfield A. Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. New York: Oxford University Press; 1960.
66. Silva E. The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Boulder: Westview Press; 1996.
67. Skinner Q. Language and Social Change. In: Tully J, editor. Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1988.
68. Straus S. Contested Meanings and Conflicting Imperatives: A Conceptual Analysis of Genocide. J Genocide Res. 2001;3(3):349-375.
69. Tironi EB. "Por qué Chile necesita aranceles diferenciados?" Estudios Públicos 1985;19:21-36.
70. Valdés S. "Orígenes de la Crisis de la Deuda: Nos Sobreendeudamos o Nos Prestaron en Exceso? Estudios Públicos 1989;33:135-174.
71. Valdés JG. Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
72. Weyland K. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comp Polit. 2001;34(1):1-22.
73. Weyland K. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.
74. Weyland K. Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Polit. 2005;57:262-295.
75. Williamson J. Our Agenda and the Washington Consensus. In: Kuczynski Pedro-Pablo, Williamson J, editors. After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics; 2003.
76. Wilson B. When Social Democrats Choose Neoliberal Policies: The Case of Costa Rica. Comp Polit. 1994;26(2):149-168.
77. Zysman J, Newman A, editors. How Revolutionary was the Digital Revolution? National Responses, Market Transitions, and Global Technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006.