Seismic behavior of a buried gas pipeline under earthquake excitations

Engineering Structures

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1011-1023

  Lee, Do Hyung ^a   Kim, Byeong Hwa ^b   Lee, Hacksoo ^c   Kong, Jung Sik ^c  

^a PaiChai University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungnam University   (South Korea)

^c Hannam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Buried pipeline; Deformation capacity; Earthquake analysis; Pipeline bend; Soil type

Indexed keywords

BENDING (DEFORMATION); COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); EARTHQUAKES; GAS PIPELINES; GASES; NATURAL GAS PIPELINES; NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION; PIPELINE BENDS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SOILS; STRAIN;

BURIAL DEPTHS; BURIED PIPELINE; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DEFORMATION CAPACITY; DISPLACEMENT CAPACITIES; EARTH QUAKE EXCITATIONS; EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTIONS; RELATIVE DISPLACEMENTS; RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS; RESTRAINT CONDITIONS; SEISMIC BEHA-VIOR; SEISMIC EVALUATIONS; SOIL CHARACTERISTICS; SOIL TYPE; TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS; TRANSVERSE DIRECTIONS;

PIPELINES;

BURIED STRUCTURE; DEFORMATION; GAS PIPELINE; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL TYPE;

EID: 63149185858     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. EQE summary report. The January 17. 1995 Kobe earthquake. EQE International; 1995
2. Scawthorn C., and Yanev P.I. Preliminary report 17 January 1995, Hyogo-ken Nambu, Japanese earthquake. Eng Struct 17 3 (1995) 146-157
3. Chen WW, Shih BJ, Wu CW, Chen YC. Natural gas pipeline system damages in the Ji-Ji earthquake (The City of Nantou). In: Proc of the 6th international conf on seismic zonation. 2000
4. Karinski Y.S., and Yankelevsky D.Z. Dynamic analysis of an elastic-plastic multisegment lining buried soil. Eng Struct 29 3 (2007) 317-328
5. Soliman H.O., and Datta T.K. Response of overground pipelines to random ground motion. Eng Struct 18 7 (1996) 537-545
6. Yong Y. Response of pipeline structure subjected to ground motion excitation. Eng Struct 19 8 (1997) 679-684
7. Newmark N.M., and Rosenblueth E. Fundamentals of earthquake engineering (1971), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
8. Hall W.J., and Newmark N.M. Seismic design criteria for pipelines and facilities, the current state of knowledge of lifeline: Earthquake engineering. J Struct Eng ASCE 103 (1977) 18-34
9. Wang L.R.L., O'Rourke M.J., and Pikul R.R. Seismic response behavior of buried pipelines. J Pressure Vessel Technol. ASME 101 (1979) 21-30
10. Nelson I., and Weidlinger P. Dynamic seismic analysis of long segmented lifelines. J Pressure Vessel Technol. ASME 101 (1979) 10-20
11. Muleski G.E., Ariman T., and Aumen C.P. A shell model for buried pipes in earthquakes. J Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 4 (1979) 43-51
12. O'Leary P.M., and Datta S.K. Dynamics of buried pipelines. J Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 4 (1985) 151-159
13. Luco J.E., and Barnes F.C.P. Seismic response of cylindrical shell embedded in layered visco elastic half space. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 23 (1994) 553-580
14. Wong K.C., Shah A.H., and Datta S.K. Three dimensional motion of buried pipeline. J Eng Mech ASME 112 (1986) 1319-1348
15. Datta S.K., Shah A.H., and Wong K.C. Dynamic stresses and displacements in buried pipe. J Eng Mech ASME 110 (1984) 1451-1465
16. Takada S., and Tanabe K. Three dimensional seismic response analysis of buried continuous or jointed pipelines. J Pressure Vessel Technol. ASME 109 (1987) 80-87
17. Elnashai AS, Papanikolaou V, Lee DH. ZeusNL-A program for inelastic dynamic analysis of structures. USA: MAE Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2001
18. American lifelines alliance. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. ASCE; 2001
19. CEN. Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part-1. European Standard prEN 1998-1. Draft No. 4. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2001
20. KOGAS. Guidelines for the seismic design of buried gas pipelines. Korea Gas Corporation; 2003