Explaining the negative correlation between values and practices: A note on the Hofstede-GLOBE debate

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 527-532

  Maseland, Robbert ^a   Van Hoorn, André ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63149185321     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2008.68     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Clarke, H., Kornberg, A., McIntyre, C., Bauer-Kaase, P., & Kaase, M. 1999. The effect of economic priorities on the measurement of value change: New experimental evidence. American Political Science Review, 93(3): 637-647.
2. Davis, D. W., & Davenport, C. 1999. Assessing the validity of the postmaterialism index. American Political Science Review, 93(3): 649-664.
3. Earley, P. C. 2006. Leading cultural research in the future: A matter of paradigms and taste. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 922-931.
4. Flanagan, S. 1982a. Changing values in advanced industrial societies: Inglehart's silent revolution from the perspective of Japanese findings. Comparative Political Studies, 14(4): 403-444.
5. Flanagan, S. 1982b. Measuring value change in advanced industrial societies: A rejoinder to Inglehart. Comparative Political Studies, 15(1): 99-128.
6. Haller, M. 2002. Theory and method in the comparative study of values: Critique and alternative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review, 18(2): 1 39-158.
7. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Hofstede, G. 2002. Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55(11): 1355-1361.
9. Hofstede, G. 2006. What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers' minds versus respondents' minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 882-896.
10. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Javidan, M., House, R. J., Dorfman, P. W., Hanges, P. J., & Sully de Luque, M. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 897-914.
14. Leung, K. 2006. Editor's introduction to the exchange between Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 881.
15. Macintosh, R. 1998. Global attitude measurement: An assessment of the World Values Survey Postmaterialism Scale. American Sociological Review, 63(3): 452-464.
16. Marshall, A. 1920 [1890]. Principles of economics: An introductory volume (8th ed.). London: The Macmillan Press.
17. McSweeney, B. 2002a. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1): 89-118.
18. McSweeney, B. 2002b. The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. Human Relations, 55(11): 1363-1372.
19. Silver, B., & Dowley, K. M. 2000. Measuring political culture in multiethnic societies: Reaggregating the World Values Survey. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4): 517-550.
20. Smith, P. B. 2006. When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: The GLOBE and Hofstede projects. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 915-921.
21. Sondergaard, M. 1994. Hofstede's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organization Studies, 15(3): 447-456.