A comparison of two cotton cultivars differing in maturity for within-canopy fiber property variation

Crop Science

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 651-657

  Bauer, Philip J ^a   Foulk, Jonn A ^b   Gamble, Gary R ^b   Sadler, E John ^c  

^a USDA ARS   (United States)

^b USDA ARS Cotton Quality Research Station   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 63149165905     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2008.06.0350     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Balls, W.L. 1928. Studies of quality in cotton. Macmillan, London.
2. Bauer, P.J., and J.R. Frederick. 2005. Tillage effects on canopy position specific cotton fiber properties on two soils. Crop Sci. 45:698-703.
3. Bauer, P.J., J.R. Frederick, J.M. Bradow, E.J. Sadler, and D.E. Evans. 2000. Canopy photosynthesis and fiber properties of normal- and late-planted cotton. Agron. J. 92:518-523.
4. Bednarz, C.W., and R.L. Nichols. 2005. Phenological and morphological components of cotton crop maturity. Crop Sci. 45:1497-1503.
5. Bednarz, C.W., R.L. Nichols, and S.M. Brown. 2006. Plant density modifies within-canopy cotton fiber quality. Crop Sci. 46:950-956.
6. Bennett, O.L., L.J. Erie, and A.J. Mackenzie. 1967. Boll, fiber, and spinning properties of cotton as affected by management practices. Tech. Bull. 1372. USDA-ARS, Washington, DC.
7. Bradow, J.M., P.J. Bauer, O. Hinojosa, and G. Sassenrath-Cole. 1997. Quantitation of cotton fibre-quality variations arising from boll and plant growth environments. Eur. J. Agron. 6:191-204.
8. Davidonis, G.H., A.S. Johnson, J.A. Landivar, and C.J. Fernandez. 2004. Cotton fiber quality is related to boll location and planting date. Agron. J. 96:42-47.
9. Foulk, J.A., G.R. Gamble, H. Senter, and W.R. Meredith. 2007a. Commercial cotton variety spinning study: Classic/supplemental measurement relationships. p. 1818-1823. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., New Orleans, LA. 9-12 Jan. 2007. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
10. Foulk, J.A., G.R. Gamble, H. Senter, and W.R. Meredith. 2007b. Commercial cotton variety spinning study: Descriptive statistics and distributions of cotton fiber and yarn. p. 1796-1807. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., New Orleans, LA. 9-12 Jan. 2007. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
11. Foulk, J., G. Gamble, H. Senter, and W. Meredith. 2008. Five year spinning study. p. 286-293. In Proc. Int. Cotton Conf., 29th, Bremen, Germany. 2-5 Apr. 2008. Das Faserinstitut, Bremen, Germany.
12. Gamble, G.R. 2004. Implications of surface chemistry on cotton fiber processing. J. Cotton Sci. 8:198-204.
13. Gamble, G.R. 2005. Cotton fiber chemical differences and their effects on friction behavior: A comparison of two crop years in the ATMI/ARS leading cultivars study. J. Cotton Sci. 9:56-64.
14. Gamble, G.R. 2007. The relationship between Maillard reaction product formation and the strength of griege yarns subjected to accelerated ageing conditions. In Proc. World Cotton Res. Conf., 4th, Lubbock, TX. 10-14 Sept. 2007. Available at http://wcrc.confex.com/wcrc/2007/techprogram/P1802.HTM (verified 30 Dec. 2008).
15. Jenkins, J.N., J.C. McCarty, and W.L. Parrott. 1990. Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton: Yield. Crop Sci. 30:365-369.
16. Krifa, M. 2006. Fiber length distribution in cotton processing: Dominant features and interaction effects. Textile Res. J. 76:426-435.
17. Lewis, H. 1999. How cotton fiber should be improved. In Annu. Proc. Engineered Fiber Selection Conf., 12th, Greenville, SC. 18 May 1999. Available at http://www.cottoninc.com/1999ConferencePresentations/ HowShouldFiberQualityBeImproved/HowShouldFiberQualityBeImproved.pdf?CFID= 4831630&CFTOKEN=19272267 (verified 30 Dec. 2008).
18. Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wofinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
19. Meredith, W.R., Jr., and R.R. Bridge. 1973. Yield, yield component and fiber property variation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) within and among environments. Crop Sci. 13:307-312.
20. Pace, P.F., H.T. Cralle, J.T. Cothren, and S.A. Senseman. 1999. Photosynthate and dry matter partitioning in short- and long-season cotton cultivars. Crop Sci. 39:1065-1069.
21. Stewart, J. McD. 1986. Integrated events in the flower and fruit. p. 261-300. In J.R. Mauney and J. McD. Stewart (ed.) Cotton physiology. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN.