Monitoring the complexities: Nuclear power and public opinion

Public Relations Review

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 120-122

  Luoma aho, Vilma ^a   Vos, Marita ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Issue arena; Issues; Monitoring; Nuclear power; Reputation; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 63149156785     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bruning S.D., Dials M., and Shirka A. Using dialogue to build organization-public relationships, engage publics, and positively affect organizational outcomes. Public Relations Review 34 1 (2008) 25-31
2. Cheney G., and Christensen L. What should public relations theory do, practically speaking?. Journal of Communication Management 10 1 (2006) 100-102
3. Coombs, T. W. (2001). Interpersonal communication and public relations. In: R. L. Heath (Ed.), The handbook of public relations. (pp. 105-114).
4. Deephouse D., and Carter S. An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies 42 2 (2005) 329-360
5. European Commission (2007). An energy policy for Europe. Comunication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament. Retrieved on May 2, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = COM:2007:0001:FIN:EN:HTML.
6. Flynn T. A delicate equilibrium: Balancing theory, practice and outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research 18 2 (2006) 191-201
7. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (1984), Pitman, Boston
8. Heath R. Strategic issues management (1997), Sage, Thousand Oaks
9. Heath R. Onward into more fog: Thoughts on public relations' research directions. Journal of Public Relations Research 18 2 (2006) 93-114
10. Heath R., and Nelson R. Issues management: Corporate public policymaking in an information society (1986), Sage, London
11. Lappalainen, T. (2007). Ydinvoiman kannatus ennätystasolla. Suomen Kuvalehti & Taloustutkimus, No 21/2007.
12. In: Ledingham J., and Bruning S. (Eds). Public relations as relationship management. A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
13. Luoma-aho, V. (2005). Faith-holders as Social Capital of Finnish Public Organizations. Academic Dissertation. Studies in Humanities 42, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press Retrieved on October 1, 2008, from http://dissertations.jyu.fi/studhum/9513922626.pdf.
14. McKie D. Updating public relations. "New science," research paradigms, and uneven developments. In: Heath R.L. (Ed). Handbook of public relations (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks 75-91
15. Mitchell R., Agle B., and Wood D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 4 (1997) 853-886
16. Van Woerkum C., and Aarts M. The orientation of organizations to their environments: Functions of the unconscious mind. Journal of Public Relations Research 20 2 (2008) 180-206
17. Vos M., and Schoemaker H. Monitoring the public perception of organisations (2006), Boom, Amsterdam
18. Weick K. Making sense of the organization (2001), Blackwell, Malden
19. Williams S., and Moffit A. Corporate image as an impression formation process: Prioritizing personal, organizational and environmental audience factors. Journal of Public Relations Research 9 4 (1997) 237-258
20. Wilson L. Relationships within communities. Public relations for the new century. In: Heath R. (Ed). Handbook of public relations (2001), Sage, Thousand Oaks 521-527
21. Wu X. Stakeholder identifying and positioning (SIP) models: From Google's operation in China to a general case-analysis framework. Public Relations Review 33 4 (2007) 415-425