Effect of long term exposure to 0.5 T static magnetic fields on growth and size of GH3 cells

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 114-119

  Rosen, Arthur D ^a   Chastney, Erin E ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell morphology; Cell proliferation; DC magnetic field; GH3 cells

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELDS; PROTEINS;

CA 2+; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CELL-BE; CELL/B.E; CONTROL LEVEL; DC MAGNETIC FIELD; GH3 CELL; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; STATIC MAGNETIC FIELDS;

CELL PROLIFERATION;

CALCIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CALCIUM CELL LEVEL; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MAGNETIC FIELD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; ANIMAL; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; CELL SIZE; MAGNETISM; MOUSE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; CELL SIZE; MAGNETICS; MICE;

EID: 63149154006     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20452     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Azanza MJ, Del Moral A. 1994. Cell membrane biochemistry and neurobiological approach to biomagnetism. Prog Neurobiol 44:517-601.
2. Bamburg JR. 1999. Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: Essential regulators of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Div Biol 15: 185-230.
3. Chionna A, Dwikat M, Panzarini E, Tenuzzo B, Carla EC, Verri T, Pagliara P, Abbro L, Dini L. 2003. Cell shape and plasma membrane alterations after static magnetic fields exposure. Eur J Histochem 47:299-308.
4. Cleveland DW. 1982. Treadmilling of tubulin and actin. Cell 18: 689-691.
5. Denegre JM, Valles JM, Jr., Lin K, Jordan WB, Mowry KL. 1998. Cleavage planes in frog eggs altered by strong magnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14729-14732.
6. Dini L, Abbro L. 2005. Bioeffects of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on cell cultures. Micron 36:195-217.
7. Kale PG, Baum JW. 1979. Genetic effects of strong magnetic fields in Drosophila melanogaster; homogeneous fields ranging from 13,000 to 37,000 gauss. Environ Mutagen 1:371-374.
8. Klimovskaya LD, Smirnova NP. 1976. Changes in brain evoked potentials under the influence of a permanent magnetic field. Bull Exp Biol Med 82:1125-1129.
9. ++ signaling: A new view of an old problem. J Cell Physiol 180:19-34.
10. Matteson DR, Armstrong CM. 1984. Na and Ca channels in a transformed line of anterior pituitary cells. J Gen Physiol 83:371-394.
11. Ono S. 2007. Mechanism of depolymerization and severing of actin filaments and its significance in cytoskeleton dynamics. Inter Rev Cyt 258:1-82.
12. Pollard TD, Borisy GG. 2003. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112:453-465.
13. Pope BJ, Gooch JT, Weeds AG. 1997. Probing the effects of calcium on gelsolin. Biochemistry 36:15848-15855.
14. Rosen AD. 1992. Magnetic field influence on acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiol 31) 262:C1418-C1422.
15. Rosen AD. 1996. Inhibition of calcium channel activation in GH3 cells by static magnetic fields. Biochim Biophys Acta 1282: 149-155.
16. Rosen AD. 2003a. Mechanism of action of moderate intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochem Biophys 39:163-173.
17. + channels in GH3 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 24:517-523.
18. Rosen AD, Lubowsky J. 1987. Magnetic field influence on central nervous system function. Exp Neurol 95:679-687.
19. Rosen AD, Lubowsky J. 1990. Modification of spontaneous unit discharge in the lateral geniculate body by a magnetic field. Exp Neurol 108:261-265.
20. Rosen MS, Rosen AD. 1990. Magnetic field influence on Para-mecium motility. Life Sci 46:1509-1515.
21. Sun HQ, Yamamoto M, Mejillano M, Yin HL. 1999. Gelsolin, a multifunctional actin regulatory protein. J Biol Chem 274: 33179-33182.
22. Tenuzzo B, Chionna A, Panzarini E, Lanubile R, Tarantino P, Di Jeso B, Dwikat M, Dini L. 2006. Biological effects of 6 mT static magnetic fields: A comparative study in different cell types. Bioelectromagnetics 27:560-577.
23. Trabulsi R, Pawlowski B, Wieraszko A. 1996. The influence of steady magnetic fields on the mouse hippocampal evoked potentials in vitro. Brain Res 728:135-139.
24. Valles JM, Jr. 2002. Model of magnetic field induced mitotic apparatus reorientation in frog eggs. Biophys J 82:1260-1265.
25. Wieraszko A. 2000. Dantrolene modulates the influence of steady magnetic fields on hippocampal evoked potentials in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 21:175-182.
26. Yin HL, Stossel TP. 1979. Control of cytoplasmic actin gel-sol transformation by gelsolin, a calcium-dependent regulatory protein. Nature 281:583-586.