SCORE Study Report 2: Interobserver Agreement between Investigator and Reading Center Classification of Retinal Vein Occlusion Type

Ophthalmology

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 756-761

  Scott, Ingrid U ^a   Blodi, Barbara A ^b   Ip, Michael S ^b   VanVeldhuisen, Paul C ^c   Oden, Neal L ^c   Chan, Clement K ^d   Gonzalez, Victor ^e  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c EMMES CORPORATION   (United States)

^d Southern California Desert Retina Consultants   (United States)

^e Valley Retina Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRIAMCINOLONE;

ARTICLE; BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; HEMIRETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA VEIN OCCLUSION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; GLUCOCORTICOIDS; HUMANS; INJECTIONS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE; VISUAL ACUITY; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 63149134984     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion: the Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report. Ophthalmology 102 (1995) 1425-1433
2. Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 98 (1984) 271-282
3. Manual of Policies and Procedures (MOPP) for the Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study, version 4.0 (2008), National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 4.1-8. NTIS PB2008-106870
4. Protocol for the Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study, version 7.0 (2008), National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 24-65 NTIS PB2008-113743
5. Cicchetti D.V. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6 (1994) 284-290
6. Scott I.U., Bressler N.M., Bressler S.B., et al., Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Study Group. Agreement between clinician and reading center gradings of diabetic retinopathy severity level at baseline in a phase 2 study of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Retina 28 (2008) 36-40
7. Kinyoun J.L., Martin D.C., Fujimoto W.Y., and Leonetti D.L. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 (1992) 1888-1893