A daily alternating method for comparing different signal-processing strategies in hearing aids and in cochlear implants

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 443-454

  Tyler, Richard S ^a   Witt, Shelley A ^a   Dunn, Camille C ^a   Perreau, Ann E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilateral; Cochlear implants; Hearing aids; Hearing devices; Hearing loss; Localization; Signal processing; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOWEL; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DICHOTIC LISTENING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHONETICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE;

EID: 63149114352     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.5.7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. (1985) A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-Term Learning. New York: Speech and Hearing Sciences Research Center, City University of New York.
2. Byrne D, Sinclair S, Noble W. (1998) Auditory localization for sensorineural hearing losses with good high-frequency hearing. Ear Hear 19:62-71.
3. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Spahr AJ, Maloff E. (2002) A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel picking signal processors for cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:783-788.
4. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA. (2005) Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:668-680.
5. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA, Gantz BJ. (2006) Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:425-432.
6. Fu QJ, Nogaki G, Galvin III JJ. (2005) Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: Implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6:180-189.
7. Iverson P, Hazan V, Bannister K. (2005) Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. J Acoust Soc Am 118:3267-3278.
8. Kacelnik O, Nodal FR, Parsons CH, King AJ (2006) Training-induced plasticity of auditory localization in adult mammals. PLoS Biol 4:627-638.
9. Kompis M, Vischer MW, Hausler R. (1999) Performance of compressed analogue (CA) and continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategies for cochlear implants in quiet and noise. Acta Otolaryngol 119:659-664.
10. Parkinson AJ, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ. (1998) Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1073-1087.
11. Psarros CE, Plant KL, Lee K, Decker JA, Whitford LA, Cowan RSC. (2002) Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear Hear 23:18S-27S.
12. Rosen S, Faulkner A, Wilkinson L. (1999) Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 106:3629-3636.
13. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF. (2004) Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:624-628.
14. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. (2004) Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1729-1735.
15. Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D. (1991) Children's Vowel Perception Test. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.