A contemporary assessment of facial aesthetic preferences

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 91-97

  Biller, Jason A ^a,b   Kim, David W ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^c Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ESTHETICS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 63149098799     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2008.543     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(3):328-337.
2. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RCK, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(1):64-69.
3. Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Lisas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000;24(3):179-184.
4. Wang D, Qian G, Zhang M, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American populations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997;21(4):265-269.
5. Borman H, Ozgur F, Gursu G. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1050 young adults. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42(3):280-288.
6. Westmore MG. Facial cosmetics in conjunction with surgery. Paper presented at: Aesthetic Plastic Surgical Society Meeting; May 7, 1974; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
7. Angres GG. Blepharopigmentation and eyebrow enhancement techniques for maximum cosmetic results. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985;17(10):605-611.
8. Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1808-1816.
9. Wolfort FG, Gee J, Pan D, Morris D. Nuances of aesthetic blepharoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(3):257-262.
10. Roth JM, Metzinger SE. Quantifying the arch position of the female eyebrow. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(3):235-239.
11. Cook TA, Brownrigg PJ, Wang TD, Quatela VC. The versatile midforehead browlift. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):163-168.
12. Freund RM, Nolan WB. Correlation between brow lift outcomes and aesthetic ideal for eyebrow height and shape in females. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 97(7):1343-1348.
13. Leach J. Aesthetics and the Hispanic rhinoplasty, Laryngoscope. 2002;112(11): 1903-1916.
14. Toriumi DM, Becker DG. Rhinoplasty Dissection Manual. Baltimore, MD; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:15.
15. San Francisco, California demographic information. US Census Bureau Web site, 2002. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Products/Profiles/Single/2002/ACS /Tabular/001/A4000US0031 .htm. Accessed June 10, 2005.