Phenetics: Revolution, reform or natural consequence?

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 50-61

  Jensen, Richard J ^a  

^a SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Homology; Numerical taxonomy; Phenetics

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; HOMOLOGY; NUMERICAL METHOD; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 63149085646     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.581008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (59)

1. Benson, L. 1959. Plant Classification. D.C. Heath, Lexington.
2. Briggs, B.G. 1991. One hundred years of plant taxonomy, 1889-1989. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 78: 19-32.
3. Cain, A.J. 1959. The post-Linnean development of taxonomy. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 170: 234-244.
4. Cain, A.J. & Harrison, G.A. 1960. Phyletic weighting. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 135: 1-31.
5. Cracraft, J. 1983. The significance of phylogenetic classifications for systematic and evolutionary biology. Pp. 1-17 in: Felsenstein, J. (ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. Springer, Berlin.
6. Davis, J.I. & Nixon, K.C. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41: 421-435.
7. Davis, P.H. & Heywood, V.H. 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Van Nostrand Co., Princeton.
8. De Queiroz, K. & Good, D.A. 1997. Phenetic clustering in biology: a critique. Quart. Rev. Biol. 72: 3-30.
9. DuPraw, E.J. 1964. Non-Linnean taxonomy. Nature 202: 849-852.
10. Ereshefsky, M. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnean Hierarchy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Everitt, B. 1977. Cluster Analysis. Heinemann Educational Books, London.
12. Forey, P.L. & Williams, D.M. 2004. Introduction. Pp. v-viii in: Williams, D.M. & Forey, P.L. (eds.), Milestones in Systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
13. Gilmour, J.S.L. 1961. Taxonomy. Pp. 27-45 in: MacLeod, M.A. & Cobley, L.S. (eds.), Contemporary Botanical Thought. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
14. Gilmour, J.S.L. & Walters, S.M. 1963. Philosophy and classification. Pp. 1-22 in: Turrill, W.B. (ed.), Vistas in Botany, vol. 4. Pergamon Press, London.
15. Greimler, J. & Jang, C.-G. 2007. Gentianella stiriaca, a case of reticulate evolution in the northeastern and eastern Central Alps. Taxon 56: 857-870.
16. Hull, D. 1988. Science as a Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
17. Jensen, R.J. 1983. A practical view of numerical taxonomy. Pp. 53-71 in: Felsenstein, J. (ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. Springer, Berlin.
18. Jensen, R.J. 2006. On delimiting species for taxonomic analyses. Syst. Bot. 31: 432-435.
19. Johnson, L.A.S. 1970. Rainbow's end: the quest for an optimal taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 19: 203-239.
20. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F. & Donoghue, M.J. 2002. Plant Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
21. Kamada, T., Yamashiro, T. & Maki, M. 2007. Intraspecific morphological and genetic differentiation in Scrophularia grayana (Scrophulariaceae). J. Pl. Res. 120: 437-443.
22. Kirkpatrick, R.E.B. 2007. Investigating the monophyly of Pellaea (Pteridaceae) in the context of a phylogenetic analysis of Chelanthoid ferns. Syst. Bot. 32: 504-518.
23. Kitching, I.J., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J. & Williams, D.M. 1998. Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
25. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
26. Mayr, E. 1965. Numerical phenetics and taxonomic theory. Syst. Zool. 14: 73-97.
27. McNeill, J. 1979. Purposeful phenetics. Syst. Zool. 28: 465-482.
28. Minelli, A. 1993. Biological Systematics. Chapman & Hall, London.
29. Minkoff, E.C. 1965. The effects on classification of slight alterations in numerical technique. Syst. Zool. 14: 196-213.
30. Mitter, C. 1980. The thirteenth annual numerical taxonomy conference. Syst. Zool. 29: 177-190.
31. Moss, W.W. 1972. Some levels of phenetics. Syst. Zool. 21: 236-239.
32. Moss, W.W. 1975. Review of Numerical Taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 24: 263-265.
33. Nelson. G. 1994. Homology and systematics. Pp. 101-149 in: Hall, B.K. (ed.), Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, San Diego.
34. Poulsen, A.D. & Nordal, I. 2005. A phenetic analysis and revision of Guineo-Congolean rain forest taxa of Chlorophytum (Anthericaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 148: 1-20.
35. Quicke, D.L.J. 1993. Principles and Techniques of Contemporary Taxonomy. Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
36. Ridley, M. 1986. Evolution and Classification. Longman, London.
37. Rohlf, F.J. 1963. Congruence of larval and adult classifications of Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 12: 97-117.
38. Ross, H.H. 1964. Review of Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 13: 106-108.
39. Sattler, R. 1984. Homology - a continuing challenge. Syst. Bot. 9: 382-394.
40. Schlee, D. 1975. Review of Numerical Taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 24: 266-268.
41. Scott-Ram, N.R. 1990. Transformed Cladistics, Taxonomy and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Simpson, G.G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Simpson, G.G. 1964. Numerical taxonomy and biological classification. Science 144: 712-713.
44. Sneath, P.H.A. 1961. Recent developments in theoretical and quantitative taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 10: 118-139.
45. Sneath, P.H.A. 1962. The construction of taxonomic groups. Pp. 289-332 in: Ainsworth, G.C. & Sneath, P.H.A. (eds.), Microbial Classification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Sneath, P.H.A. 1983. Philosophy and method in biological classification. Pp. 22-37 in: Felsenstein, J. (ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. Springer, Berlin.
47. Sneath, P.H.A. 1995. Thirty years of numerical taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 44: 281-298.
48. Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
49. Sokal, R.R. 1965. Statistical methods in systematics. Biol. Rev. 40: 337-391.
50. Sokal, R. R. 1975. Mayr on cladism - and his critics. Syst. Zool. 23: 257-262.
51. Sokal, R.R., Camin, J.H., Rohlf, F.J. & Sneath, P.H.A. 1965. Numerical taxonomy: some points of view. Syst. Zool. 14: 237-243.
52. Sokal, R.R. & Crovello, T.J. 1970. The biological species concept: a critical evaluation. Amer. Naturalist 104: 127-153.
53. Sokal, R.R. & Sneath, P.H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
54. Stevens, P.F. 1984. Homology and phylogeny: morphology and systematics. Syst. Bot. 9: 395-409.
55. Stevens, P.F. 1994. The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent Jussieu, Nature, and the Natural System. Columbia University Press, New York.
56. Stevens, P.F. 2000. Botanical systematics 1950-2000: change, progress, or both? Taxon 49: 635-659.
57. Van der Steen, W.J. & Boontje, W. 1973. Phylogenetic versus phenetic taxonomy: a reappraisal. Syst. Zool. 22: 55-63.
58. Watt, J.C. 1968. Grades, clades, phenetics, and phylogeny. Syst. Zool. 17: 350-353.
59. Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.