SBI: A semantic framework to support business intelligence

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Ontology-supported Business Intelligence, OBI 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Sell, Denilson ^a,b,c   Da Silva, Dhiogo Cardoso ^a,b   Beppler, Fabiano Duarte ^a,b   Napoli, Mareio ^a,b   Ghisi, Fernando Benedet ^a,b   Pacheco, Roberto C S ^a,b   Todesco, José Leomar ^a,b  

^a Stela Institute   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c SANTA CATARINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Business intelligence; Heterogeneous data sources; OLAP; Ontology

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; SEMANTICS;

ANALYTICAL TOOLS; BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE; BUSINESS RULES; DECISION MAKERS; HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES; OLAP; ON THE FLIES; SEMANTIC FRAMEWORKS; SEMANTIC INFERENCES; SEMANTIC INFRASTRUCTURES;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 63149085587     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1452567.1452578     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Beppler, F. D.; Todesco, J. L.; Gonçalves, A. L.; Sell, D.; Morales, A. B. T.; Pacheco, R. C. S. (2005) Uma Arquitetura para Recuperação de Informa̧ão Aplicada ao Processo de Coopera̧ão Universidade-Empresa. In: KM BRASIL 2005, São Paulo.
2. Bergamaschi, S.; Quix, C.; Jarke, M. (2005) The SEWASIE EU IST Project. SIG SEMIS Bulletin, vol. 2, n. 1, Feb. 2005.
3. CNPq. Diretório de Grupos de Pesquisa no Brasil: Censo 2004 - 2002 - 2000 e base corrente. Brasília. Available at: 〈http://dgp.cnpq. br/censo2004/〉. Access in: May 01, 2006.
4. Cody, W.F.; Kreulen, J.T.; Krishna, V.; Spangler, W.S. The integration of business intelligence and knowledge management. IBM Systems Journal. vol. 41, issue 4, 2002, p. 697-713.
5. Computerworld. Top 10 Critical Challenges for BI Success. Available at: 〈http://www.computerworld.com/services/whitepapers/story/0, 4793,82630,00.html〉. Access in: Oct 10, 2006.
6. Gartner Group. DW failures through 2007. Available at: 〈http://www.gartner.com/press-releases/asset-12181711.html〉. Access in: Aug 14, 2006.
7. Gonzaga, T. Uma metodologia para o desenvolvimento de instrumentos de análise multidimensional da informa̧ão em projetos de governo eletrônico voltado ao cidadão. 2005. Disserta̧ão (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produ̧ão) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
8. Kimball, R.; Ross, M. The Data Warehouse toolkit: The Complete Guide to Dimensional Modeling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
9. Liebowitz, J. Where is the "Intelligence" behind Business Intelligence?. BusinessIntelligence.com. Available at: 〈http://www. businessintelligence.com/ex/asp/code.128/xe/article.htm〉, Access in: Mar 12, 2007.
10. Mondrian. Mondrian OLAP Server. Available at: 〈http://mondrian. sourceforge.net/〉. Access in: May 17, 2006.
11. Motta, E. Reusable Components for Knowledge Modeling. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999.
12. Priebe, T.; Pernul, G. Ontology-based integration of OLAP and information retrieval. In: The DEXA 2003 Workshop on Web Semantics, September 2003, Prague, Czech Republic.
13. Sell, D.; Cabral, L.; Motta, E.; Domingue, J.; Pacheco, R. (2005) Adding Semantics to Business Intelligence. In: 16th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Denmark. IEEE Compute Society Press.
14. Tissot, H. Proposta para documenta̧ão de requisitos em projetos de Data Warehouse. 2004. Disserta̧ão (Mestrado em Engenharia de Produ̧ão) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.
15. XMLA. XML for Analysis. Available at: 〈http://www.xmla.org/〉. Access in: Aug 23, 2006.
16. W3C. Extensible Markup Language (XML). Available: 〈 http://www.w3.org/XML/〉. Access in: Oct 20, 2007.
17. W3C. Resource Description Framework (RDF). Available at: 〈 http://www.w3.org/RDF/〉. Access in: Jan 11, 2005
18. Marshall, R. Gartner predicts slow growth in BI during 2008: Analyst firm predicts that 2008 will see a slow down in business intelligence investments. ITWeek, Jan 11, 2008. Available at 〈http://www.itweek.co.uk/itweek/news/ 2207083/gartnerpredicts-slow-growth-bi〉. Access in: Jul 11, 2008.
19. Toivonen, S. and Niemi, T. Describing Data Sources Semantically for Facilitating Efficient Creation of OLAP Cubes. In: 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), November 2004, Hiroshima, Japan
20. Lassila, O. and R. R. Swick. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, W3C, 1998.
21. McGuinness, D. L. and F. v. Harmelen. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C World Wide Web Consortium 2004. Available at (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl- features/)
22. McBride, B. Jena: A Semantic Web Toolkit. Internet Computing, IEEE 6(6): 55-59, 2002.
23. Sell, D. Uma Arquitetura para Business Intelligence baseada em Tecnologias Semânticas para Suporte a Aplicações Analíticas. Florianópolis, 2006. Thesis - Production Engineering, UFSC
24. SWRL. Semantic Web Rule Language. Available at 〈http://www.w3.org/ Submission/SWRL〉. Access in: May 22, 2006.
25. White, C. The Role of Business Intelligence in Knowledge Management. B Eye. Mar. 2005 Available at: 〈http://www.beye-network.com/view/720〉. Access in: Mar 30, 2007.
26. Liebowitz, J. Business Intelligence Cannot Exist Without Knowledge Management. Businesslntelligence.com. Available at: 〈http://www. businessintelligence.com/ex/asp/code.123/xe/article.htm〉. Access in: Mar 28, 2007.
27. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B. C., Kalyanpur, A., & Katz, Y. (2007). Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics (Elsevier), 5(2), 51-53.
28. Paton, N. W.; Stevens, R.; Baker, P.; Goble, C. A.; Bechofer, S.; Brass, A.;. Query Processing in the TAMBIS Bioinformatics Source Integration System. Statistical and Scientific Database Management, pp. 138-14, 1999.
29. Mena, E.; Kashyap, V.; Sheth, A.; Illarramendi, A.; Observer: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems. Proc. Of Conference on Cooperative Systems, pp. 14-25, 1996.