Effects of aggregate structure on hot-mix asphalt rutting performance in low traffic volume local pavements

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2177-2182

  Kim, Yong Rak ^a   Park, Hee Mun ^b   Sacramento Aragão, Francisco Thiago ^a   Sudo Lutif, Jamilla Emi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Low traffic volume pavement; Restricted zone; Rutting performance; Superpave

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT; ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; ROADS AND STREETS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

AGGREGATE GRADATIONS; AGGREGATE STRUCTURES; ANALYSIS RESULTS; CONTROLLING FACTORS; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; HOT-MIX ASPHALTS; IN FIELDS; LOW TRAFFIC VOLUME PAVEMENT; RESTRICTED ZONE; RUTTING PERFORMANCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SUPERPAVE; SUPERPAVE MIXES;

AGGREGATES;

EID: 63149083359     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Engle EJ. Superpave mix designs for low volume roads. Report no. TR-414, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA; 2004.
2. Mogawer W, Mallick RB. Design of Superpave HMA for low volume roads. Report no. NETCR 51, New English Transportation Consortium; 2005.
3. McDaniel R, Zerfas W. Developing tools for local agencies in minnesota: guidelines for Superpave for low volume roads. TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC; 2006.
4. Vitillo N, Bennert T, Smith J, Maher A. Evaluation of Superpave mix design for low volume roads in New Jersey. TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC; 2006.
5. Abdelrahman M, Schram S. Field evaluation of implementation issues for Superpave on low volume roads. TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC; 2007.
6. Watson DE, Johnson A, Jared D. The Superpave gradation restricted zone and performance testing with georgia loaded wheel tester. In: Transportation Research Record 1583. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 1997. p. 106-11.
7. Chowdhury A, Joe WB, Jose DCG. Effects of Superpave restricted zone on permanent deformation. Project title: evaluation of Superpave aggregate specifications. Report no. 201-202, Texas A&M University; 2001.
8. Hand AJ, Epps AL. Impact of gradation relative to Superpave restricted zone on hot-mix asphalt performance. In: Transportation Research Record 1767. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2001. p. 158-66.
9. Hand AJ, Stiady JL, White TD, Noureldin AS, Galal K. Gradation effects on hot-mix asphalt perfomance. In: Transportation Research Record 1767. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2001. p. 152-7.
10. Kandhal PS, Cooley Jr LA. The restricted zone in the Superpave aggregate gradation specification. NCHRP Report no. 464, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 2001.
11. Kandhal PS, Mallick RB. Effect of mix gradation on rutting potential of dense-graded asphalt mixtures. In: Transportation Research Record 1767. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2001. p. 146-51.
12. Kandhal PS, Cooley Jr LA. Coarse-versus fine-graded Superpave mixtures - comparative evaluation of resistance to rutting. In: Transportation Research Record 1789. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2002. p. 216-24.
13. Nukunya B, Roque R, Tia M, Metha YA. Effect of aggregate structure on rutting potential of dense-graded asphalt mixtures. In: Transportation Research Record 1789. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2002. p. 136-45.
14. Zhang J, Cooley Jr LA. Hurley G, Parker F. Effect of Superpave defined restricted zone on hot-mix asphalt performance. In: Transportation Research Record 1891. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2004. p. 103-11.
15. Mahmoud AFF, Bahia H. Using the gyratory compactor to measure mechanical stability of asphalt mixtures. Report 0092-01-02 of the Wisconsin Highway Research Program. Wisconsin Department of Transportation; 2004.
16. Sebaaly PE, Hand AJT, McNamara WM, Weitzel D, Epps JA, Field and laboratory performance of Superpave mixtures in Nevada. In: Transportation Research Record 1891. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 2004, p. 76-84.