The role of advocacy in shaping immigrant education: A California case study

Teachers College Record

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 817-850

  Olsen, Laurie ^a  

^a Sobrato Early Acad Literacy for Engl Learner Success Initiative

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63049131096     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
2. Baldassare, M. (2002). A California state of mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Berman, P. J., Chamber, J., Gandara, P., McLaughlin, B., Minicucci, C., Nelson, B., et al, (1992). Meeting the challenge of language diversity: An evaluation of programs for pupils with limited proficiency in English. Berkeley, CA: BW Associates.
4. Binder, D. (1998). Report to the Executive Committee, Citizens for an Educated America. Unpublished manuscript, David Binder Research, San Francisco, CA.
5. California Secretary of State. (1997). English for the Children. Sacramento: Author.
6. California Secretary of State. (1998). Argument in Favor of Proposition 227, Primary 98 Analysis and Rebuttal Sacramento: Author.
7. California Tomorrow. (1998). Why Proposition 227 is wrong for California. San Francisco: Author.
8. Center for Applied Linguistics. (2002). Directory of two-way bilingual immersion programs in the U.S. Retrieved August 3, 2008, from http://www.cal.org/twi/directory
9. Cline, Z., & Necochea, J. (2001).Basta Ya! Latino parents fighting entrenched racism. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(1&2), 2-27.
10. Cornelius, W. A. (1995). Educating California's immigrant children: Introduction and overview. In W. A. Cornelius & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), California's immigrant children: Theory, research and implications for educational policy (pp. 1-16). La Jolla: Center for U.S. Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.
11. Crawford, J. (1992a). Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of English only. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Crawford, J. (1992b). Language loyalties: A source book on the official English controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Crawford, J. (1997). The campaign against Proposition 227: A post mortem. Bilingual Research Journal, 21, 1-29.
14. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Dissemination and Assessment Center Evaluation, California State University (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3-49). Los Angeles: California Department of Education.
15. Escamilla, K., Shannon, S., & Garcia, J. (2003). Breaking the code: Colorado's defeat of the anti-bilingual education initiative. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 357-382.
16. Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University. (1981). Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles: Author. "Exit poll: Profile of the electorate." (1998, June 4). Los Angeles Times.
17. Gandara, P., & Sun, A. (1997a). Bilingual education: Learning English in California. Sacramento: California State Legislature Assembly Office of Research Joint Publications Office.
18. Gandara, P., & Sun, A (1997b). Review of the research on instruction of limited English profitent students: A report to the California State Legislature. Davis: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
19. Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1995). A longitudinal study of transitional and immersion bilingual education programs in one district. Elementary School Journal, 95, 223-239.
20. Goldberg, J. (1998, March). Keynote speech, California Association for Bilingual Education meeting, San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, CA.
21. Greene, J. P. (1998) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bilingual education. Claremont, CA: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
22. Griswold, B. (1998, May 13). The language lie: Bilingual education works; is that why Ron Unz wants to kill it? San Francisco Bay Guardian.
23. Krashen, S. (1991, Spring). Bilingual education: A focus on current research [Special issue], NCBEFOCUS: Occasional Papers in Bilingual Education, 3.
24. Lau V. Nichols. 414 U.S. 563, 94S. Ct.786, 39L.Ed.2dl 1974.
25. Moran, R. F. (1998). The politics of discretion: Federal intervention in bilingual education. California Law Review, 76, 1249-1352.
26. Office of Civil Rights. (1970). May 25 Memorandum of 1970: Interpretation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Olsen, L. (1990). Then and now: A comparative perspective on immigration and school reform during two periods in American history. California Perspectives, 1, 3-12.
28. Olsen, L., & Salinas, R. (1998, June 6). Concession speech/press release, Citizens for an Educated America, Los Angeles, CA.
29. Owens, R. (1998, March). Interview with Ron Unz, KGO Newstalk Radio, San Francisco, CA.
30. Parrish, T., Perez, M., Merikel, A., & Linquanti, R. (2006) Effects of the implementation of Proposition 227 on the education of English learners K-12: Findings from a five year evaluation; Final Report. San Francisco: American Institutes of Research and WestEd
31. Pompa, D. (1998). Testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education on the Fiscal Year 1999 Budget Request for Bilingual and Immigrant Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. "Prop 63 deserves approval." (1986, October 24). San Francisco Examiner.
32. Ramirez, J. D., Pasta, D. J., Yuen, S. D., Billings, D. K., & Ramey D. R. (1991) Final Report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language minority children. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
33. Rossell, C. H., Se Baker, K. (1996). The educational effectiveness of bilingual education. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(1), 7-74.
34. Schmid, C. L. (2001). The politics of language: Conflict, identity and cultural pluralism in comparative perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Schrag, P. (1997, December 3). Initiative puts meat ax to bilingual education. Sacramento Bee.
36. Schultz, J. (1998). Proposition 227: The morning after. Democracy Center On-Line, 14. Retrieved August 4, 2008, from http://www.democracyctr. org/newsletter/voll4.htm
37. Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective reading programs for English language learners: A Best evidence synthesis; Report for the Institute of Education Sciences. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Center for Data Driven Reform in Education.
38. Welner, K., & Escamilla, K. (2002, August) The unintended consequences of Colorado's anti-bilingual initiative (Report). Boulder: EPIC Policy Center, University of Colorado School of Education.
39. Wolfe, A. (1996). Marginalized in the middle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.