Outcome analysis of surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff: A comparison of subjective and objective scoring tools

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 367-373

  Allom, R ^a   Colegate Stone, T ^b   Gee, M ^c   Ismail, M ^d   Sinha, J ^b  

^a LEWISHAM AND GREENWICH NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDWAY MARITIME HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ARTHROSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; HOSPITALIZATION; INJURY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATOR CUFF; SHOULDER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROSCOPY; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATOR CUFF; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHOULDER JOINT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63049125834     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.20714     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Codman EA, Chipman WW, Clark JG, Kanavel AB, Mayo WJ. Standardisation of hospitals: report of the committee appointed by the Clinical Congress of Surgeons of North America. Trans Clin Con Surg North Am 1913;4:2-8.
2. Harvie P, Pollard TCB, Chennagiri RJ, Carr AJ. The use of outcome scores in surgery of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:151-4.
3. Conboy VB, Morris RW, Kiss J, Carr AJ. An evaluation of the Constant-Murley Shoulder Assessment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:229-32.
4. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG): development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-8.
5. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:593-600.
6. Constant CR, Murley AHG. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 1987;214:160-4.
7. Constant CR. Constant scoring technique for shoulder function. SECEC information 1991 Nr 3.
8. Lin LI-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255-68.
9. Grassi FA, Tajana MS. The normalization of data in the Constant-Murley score for the shoulder: a study conducted on 563 healthy subjects. Chir Organi Mov 2003;88:65-73.
10. Katolik LI, Romeo AR, Cole BJ, et al. Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:279-85.
11. Othman A, Taylor G. Is the Constant score reliable in assessing patients with frozen shoulder?: 60 shoulders scored 3 years after manipulation under anaesthesia. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:114-16.
12. Patel VR, Singh D, Calvert PT, Bayley Jl. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: results and factors affecting outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:231-7.
13. Fialka C, Oberleitner G, Stampfl P, et al. Modification of the Constant-Murley shoulder score: introduction of the individual relative Constant score individual shoulder assessment, Injury 2005;36:1159-65.
14. Dawson J, Hill G, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment: medium-term results of an observational study of shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]2001;83-B:877-82.
15. Tingart M, Bathis H, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Tiling T. Constant score and Neer score: a comparison of score results and subjective patient satisfaction. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:1048-54 (in German).
16. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validing and measuring selfrated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2003;4:11.
17. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Anderson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;71:613-18.
18. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2006;7:44.