Acquisition of relations between the conceptual and linguistic dimensions of linearization in descriptive text composition in grades five to nine: A comparison with oral production

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 107-130

  Favart, Monik ^a   Passerault, Jean Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONCEPT FORMATION; CREATIVITY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TEACHING; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMMUNICATION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CREATIVENESS; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TEACHING; WRITING;

EID: 63049124031     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709908X289981     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adam, J. M., & Petitjean, A. (1989). Le texte descriptif. Paris: Nathan-Université.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In J. S. Carlson & E. C. Butterfly (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice. Vol. 2: Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Bronckart, J. P., Bain, D., Schneuwly, B., Davaud, C., & Pasquier, A. (1985). Le fonctionnement des discours. Neuchatel, Paris: Delachaux-Niestlé.
5. Brotherton, P. (1979). Speaking and not speaking: Processes for translating ideas into speech. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Of speech and time: Temporal speech patterns in interpersonal contexts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brown, T. L., & Carr, T. H. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 45-59.
7. Caron, J. (1997). Toward a procedural approach of the meaning of connectives. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships. Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 53-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Coirier, P., Broggio, E., & De Bernardi, B. (1996). Systemic relations between compositional skills in 12- to 18- year-olds: Some empirical data. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG writing conference. Barcelona, Spain, October 23-25.
9. Coirier, P., Favart, M., & Chanquoy, L. (2002). Ordering and structuring ideas in text: From conceptual organization to linguistic formulation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XVII(2), 157-175.
10. Ehrich, V., & Koster, C. (1983). Discourse organization and sentence form: The structure of room descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Processes, 6, 169-195.
11. Favart, M. (2005). Les marques de cohésion: Leur rôle fonctionnel dans l'acquisition de la production écrite de texte. Psychologie Française, 50(5), 305-322.
12. Favart, M., Barra, S., & Chanquoy, L. (2002). Evolution of planning at elementary school in narrative and descriptive texts: An oral/writing comparison. EARLISIG Writing Conference. Staffordshire, UK, July 10-13.
13. Favart, M., & Coirier, P. (2006). Acquisition of the linearization process in text composition in third to ninth graders: Effects of textual superstructure and macrostructural organization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(4), 305-328.
14. Favart, M., & Passerault, J. M. (1995). Evolution du rôle fonctionnel des connecteurs et de la planification du récit écrit chez les enfants de 7 à 11 ans. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 115-117, 198-212.
15. Favart, M., & Passerault, J. M. (1999). Aspects textuels du fonctionnement et du développement des connecteurs: Approche en production. L'Année Psychologique, 99, 149-173.
16. Favart, M., & Passerault, J. M. (2000). Aspects fonctionnels du point et de la virgule dans révolution de la planification du récit écrit. Enfance, 2, 187-205.
17. Foulin, J. N. (1995). Pauses et débits: Les indicateurs temporels de la production écrite. L'Année Psychologique, 95, 483-504.
18. Gillam, R., & Johnston, J. (1992). Spoken and written language relationships in language learning impaired and normally achieving school-age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1303-1315.
19. Good, D. A., & Butterworth, B. (1980). Hesitancy as a conversational resource: Some methodological implications. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech (pp. 145-152). The Hague: Mouton.
20. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Hidi, S. E., & Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types. Discourse Processes, 6, 91-105.
22. Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 327-342.
23. Levelt, W. J. M. (1981). The speaker's linearization problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 295B, 305-315.
24. Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (Eds.), Processes, beliefs and questions (pp. 199-220). Dordrecht: Reidel.
25. Levin, H., Silverman, I., & Ford, B. I. (1967). Hesitation in children's speech during explanation and description. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 560-564.
26. MacArthur, C. A., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Improving students' planning processes through cognitive strategy instruction. In J. S. Carlson & E. C. Butterfield (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2: Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 173-198). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skills: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing. Discourse Processes, 10, 267-286.
28. McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. InJ. S. Carlson & E. C. Butterfly (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 2: Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 1-30). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
30. Mounier, E., & Bisseret, A. (2001). Usage de la ponctuation dans la description technique: Marquer la partition de l'objet décrit. Le Travail Humain, 64(4), 363-390.
31. O'Connell, D. C., & Kowall, S. H. (1983). Pausology. In W. Sedelow & S. Sedelow (Eds.), Computers in language research 2 (pp. 221-301). Berlin, New York: Mouton.
32. Passerault, J. M. (1991). La ponctuation: Recherches en psychologie du langage. Pratiques, 70, 85-106.
33. Pinchon, J., & Morel, M. A. (1991). Rapport de la ponctuation à l'oral dans quelques dialogues de romans contemporains. Langue Française, 89, 5-19.
34. Piolat, A. (1981). Effet de la représentation du destinataire sur le comportement de pause du locuteur. Journées d'Etudes de la Société Française de Psychologie, March 26-28, Poitiers, France.
35. Robin, F. (2002). Production et coordination des termes spatiaux entre 6 et 9 ans. Enfance, 4, 363-379.
36. Rochester, S. R. (1973). The significance of pauses in spontaneous speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 51-81.
37. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition, 20(5), 483-496.
38. Ullmer-Ehrich, V. (1982). The structure of living space descriptions. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 219-248). Chichester: Wiley.
39. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.