Integration of 3D reconstruction in the SELection criteria for Excessive Crossing Times for Magnetically Supported Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. SELECT-MP

EuroIntervention

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 509-516

  Patterson, Mark S ^a,b   Hoeks, Sanne E ^b   Rijkenberg, Saskia ^b   Ramchartar, Steve ^b   Van Guens, Robert Jan ^b   Tanimoto, Shuzou ^b   Van Domburg, Ron T ^b   Serruys, Patrick W ^b  

^a ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Angioplasty; Complications; Risk stratification

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETISM; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 63049114016     PISSN: 1774024X     EISSN: 19696213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4244/EIJV4I4A86     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Patterson MS, Schotten J, van Mieghem C, Kiemeneij F, Serruys PW. Magnetic Navigation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 2006;19(6), 1-6.
2. Patterson MS, Ramcharitar S. Serruys PW. Magnetically Supported PCI: success after failed surgery and conventional PCI. Cath Lab Digest 2007;15(3): 1-14.
3. Ramcharitar S, Patterson MS, Serruys PW. Randomised controlled study comparing conventional wires with magnetic guided wires in a tortuous phantom. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2006;69: 852-855.
4. Kiemeneij F, Patterson MS, Amoroso G, Laarman G, Slagboom T. Use of the Stereotaxis Niobe magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 350 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Mar 1;71(4): 510-6.
5. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB 3rd, Loop FD, Peterson KL, Reeves TJ, Williams DO, Winters WL Jr. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report for the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 1988;78: 486-502.
6. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ and the POSCH Group. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990;82: 1193-1202.
7. Krone RJ, Laskey WK, Johnson C, Kimmel SE, Klein LW, Weiner BH, Cosentino JJ, Johnson SA, Babb JD for the Registry Committee of he Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2000;85: 1179-1184.
8. Singh M, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, Garratt KN, Holmes DR. Comparison of Mayo Risk Score and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Lesion Classification in the Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Card 2004;44: 357-61.
9. Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, Vaina S, Morel MA, van den Brand MJ, Colombo A, Morice MC, Dawkins K, de Bruyne B, Kornowski R, de Servi S, Guagliumi G, Jukema JW, Mohr FW, Kappetein AP, Wittebols K, Stoll HP, Boersma E, Parrinello G; ARTS II Investigators. Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the syntax score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(8): 1072-81.
10. Dvir D, Marom H, Assali A, Kornowski R. Bifurcation Lesions in the Coronary Arteries: Early Experience with a Novel 3-Dimensional Imaging and Quantitative Analysis Before and After Stenting. Eurointerv 2007;3: 95-99.
11. Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Van Houwelingen JC, Lee KL, Habbema JD. Prognostic models based on literature and individual patient data in logistic regression analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(2): 141-60.
12. Moushmoush B, Kramer B, Hsieh AM, Klein LW. Does the AHA/ACC task force grading system predict outcome in multivessel coronary angioplasty? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;27: 97-105.
13. Herrman JPR, Azar A, Umans VAWM, Boersma E, V Es G-A, Serruys PW. Inter- and intra-observer variability in the qualitative categorization of coronary angiograms. Int J Card Imaging 1996;12: 21-30.
14. Botas J, Stadius ML, Bourassa MG, Rosen AD, Schaff HV, Sopko G, Williams DO, McMilliam A, Alderman EL. Angiographic correlates of lesion relevance and suitability for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Study (BARI). Am J Cardiol 1996;77: 805-814.
15. Kleiman NS, Rodriguez AR, Raizner AE. Interobserver variability in grading of coronary arterial narrowings using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association grading criteria. Am J Cardiol 1992;69: 413-415.
16. Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, Block PC, Anderson HV, Weintraub WS, Brindis RG, McKay CR; ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current "stent era" of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(4): 389-94.
17. Kimmel SE, Berlin JB, Strom BL, Laskey WK, for the Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Development and validation of a simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26: 931-938.
18. Ellis SG, Guetta V, Miller D, Whitlow PL, Topol EJ. Relation between lesion characteristics and risk with percutaneous intervention in the stent and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa era: an analysis of results from 10 907 lesions and proposal for new classification scheme. Circulation 1999;100: 1971-1976.
19. Zaacks SM, Klein LW. The AHA/ACC task force criteria: what is its value in the device era? American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43: 9 -10.
20. IJsselmuiden AJJ, Patterson MS, van Nooijen FC, Tangelder G-J, Dirksen MT, Amoroso G, Slagboom T, Serruys PW, Laarman GJ, Kiemeneij F. Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption. Eurointerv 2008;4: 517-523.