Response to vanclay et al. on farming styles: Q methodology for identifying styles and its relevance to extension

Sociologia Ruralis

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 189-198

  Fairweather, John R ^a   Klonsky, Karen ^b  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63049102051     PISSN: 00380199     EISSN: 14679523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00482.x     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Addams, H. and J. Proops eds (2000) Social discourse and environmental policy: An application of Q methodology (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)
2. Brodt, S.K. Klonsky, and L. Tourte (2006) Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agricultural Systems 89 (1) pp. 90-105
3. Brown, S. (1980) Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)
4. Colombo, A. (2006) Ideal type. Pp. 141-142 in V. Jupp ed. The Sage dictionary of social research methods (London: Sage)
5. Davies, B.B. and I.D. Hodge (2007) Exploring environmental perspectives in lowland agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK. Ecological Economics 61 (2/3) pp. 323-333
6. Fairweather, J.R. (1996) We don't want to see our neighbour's washing: rural lifestyle ambitions and constraints around Christchurch. New Zealand Geographer 52 (2) pp. 76-83
7. Fairweather, J.R. and C. Keating (1994) Goals and management styles of New Zealand farmers. Agricultural Systems 44 (2) pp. 181-200
8. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (1995) Preferences for land use options involving forestry in the Mackenzie/Waitaki basin. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 21 (1) pp. 20-38
9. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (1996) Preferences for scenarios of land-use change in the Mackenzie/Waitaki Basin. New Zealand Forestry 41 (1) pp. 17-26
10. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (2000) Q method using photographs to study perceptions of the environment in New Zealand. Pp. 131-158 in H. Addams and J. Proops eds, Social discourses and environmental policy: application of Q methodology (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)
11. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (2001) Visitor experiences of Kaikoura, New Zealand: An interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method. Tourism Management 22 (3) pp. 219-228
12. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (2002) Visitors' and locals' experiences of Rotorua New Zealand: An interpretative study using photographs of landscapes and Q method. International Journal of Tourism Research 4 (4) pp. 283-297
13. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (2003) Visitor experiences in New Zealand: Results from a third case study and identification of themes across studies. Tourism, Culture and Communication 4 (2) pp. 57-70
14. Fairweather, J.R. and S.R. Swaffield (2004) Public perceptions of outstanding natural landscapes in the Auckland region. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit Research Report No. 273 (Canterbury: Lincoln University)
15. Gerhart, U. (2006) Ideal type. Pp. 259-260 in A. Harrington, B. Marshall and H. Muller eds, Encyclopedia of social theory (London: Routledge)
16. McKeown, B. and D. Thomas (1988) Q methodology (Newbury Park, CA: Sage)
17. Newton, B.M., S.R. Swaffield and J.R. Fairweather (2002) Public perceptions of natural character in New Zealand: Wild nature versus cultured nature. New Zealand Geographer 58 (2) pp. 14-25
18. Peace, R., S. Crack, I. Hutchinson and M. Roorda (2004) Wellbeing, employment, independence: The views of sickness and invalids' benefit clients. Working Paper 08/04. Centre for Social Research and Evaluation (Wellington: Ministry of Social Development)
19. Previte, J., B. Pini and F. Haslam-McKenzie (2007) Q methodology and rural research. Sociologia Ruralis 47 (2) pp. 135-147
20. Robbins, P. and R. Kreuger (2000) Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. Professional Geographer 52 (4) pp. 636-648
21. Stephenson, W. (1935) Technique of factor analysis. Nature 136 (3434) p. 297
22. Stephenson, W. (1953) The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
23. Stephenson, W. (1977) Factors as operant subjectivity. Operant Subjectivity 1 (1) pp. 3-16
24. Swaffield, S.R. and Fairweather, J.R. (1998) In search of Arcadia: The persistence of the rural idyll in New Zealand rural subdivisions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41 (1) pp. 111-127
25. Swaffield, S.R. and J.R. Fairweather (2000) Community perception of forest sector development on the New Zealand East Coast: Likely and acceptable employment activities, infrastructure and land use. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit Research Report No. 248 (Canterbury: Lincoln University)
26. Vanclay, F.P. Howden, L. Mesiti and S. Glyde (2006) The social and intellectual construction of farming styles: Testing Dutch ideas in Australian agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 46 (1) pp. 61-82
27. Wilson, J. (1998) Agricultural perspectives in eastern Iowa: A comparison of organic and conventional producers using Q methodology. Department of Geography (Iowa City: University of Iowa)
28. Wolf, A. (2004) The bones in a concourse. Operant Subjectivity 27 (3) pp. 145-165