RATE: A review of Reviewers in a manuscript review process

Proceedings - 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 204-207

  Wei, Wei ^a   Chan, Kam Tong ^a   King, Irwin ^a   Lee, Jimmy Ho Man ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARAMETER SETTINGS; RATE MODELS; REVIEW PROCESS; TESTING ALGORITHMS; TESTING AND EVALUATIONS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 62949243457     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WIIAT.2008.42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. C. Basu, H. Hirsh, W. W. Cohen, and C. G. Nevill-Manning. Technical paper recommendation: A study in combining multiple information sources. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 14:231-252, 2001.
2. S. T. Dumais and J. Nielsen. Automating the assignment of submitted manuscripts to reviewers. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 233-244, 1992.
3. S. Hettich and M. J. Pazzani. Mining for proposal reviewers: lessons learned at the national science foundation. In KDD. ACM, 2006.
4. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5):604-632, 1999.
5. H. W. Lauw, E.-P. Lim, and K. Wang. Summarizing review scores of unequal reviewers. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2007.
6. Riggs, Tracy and Wilensky, Robert. An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers. In JCDL'01: Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Scholarly Communication and Digital Libraries.
7. W. Wei, J. Lee, and I. King. Measuring credibility of users in an e-learning environment. In Poster Proceedings of 16th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada. ACM, 2007.