Access to archival material in context

IIiX'08: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 102-109

  Fachry, Khairun Nisa ^a   Kamps, Jaap ^a   Zhang, Junte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Archival finding aids; Focused retrieval; XML retrieval

Indexed keywords

ARCHIVAL FINDING AIDS; ARCHIVAL MATERIALS; DIRECT ACCESS; ENCODED ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTIONS; FOCUSED RETRIEVAL; PAPER TRAILS; STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS; THREE SYSTEMS; USER STUDIES; XML RETRIEVAL;

INFORMATION SERVICES; MARKUP LANGUAGES; XML;

MATERIALS;

EID: 62949242362     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1414694.1414718     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. L. J. Bellardo and L. L. Bellardo. A Glossary for Archivists, Manuscript Curators, and Records Managers. The Society of American Archivists, Chicago, 1992.
2. P. A. Boncz, T. Grust, M. van Keulen, S. Manegold, J. Rittinger, and J. Teubner. MonetDB/XQuery: A fast XQuery processor powered by a relational engine. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Chicago, IL, USA, 2006.
3. P. Borlund and P. Ingwersen. The development of a method for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 53:225-250, 2000.
4. L. R. Coats. Users of EAD finding aids: Who are they and are they satisfied? Journal of Archival Organization, 2:25-39, 2004.
5. S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, and H. Chen. Optimizing search by showing results in context. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 277-284, Seattle, WA, April 2001.
6. L. Duranti. Origin and development of the concept of archival description. Archivaria, 35:47-54, 1993.
7. EAD. Encoded archival description version 2002, 2002. http://www.loc.gov/ead/
8. M. Hedstrom. Descriptive practices for electronic records: Deciding what is essential and imagining what is possible. Archivaria, 36:53-63, 1993.
9. D. Hiemstra, H. Rode, R. van Os, and J. Flokstra. PF/Tijah: text search in an XML database system. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Open Source Information Retrieval (OSIR), pages 12-17, 2006.
10. IISG. International institute of social history, 2008. URL http://www.iisg.nl/
11. INEX. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval, 2008. http://www.inex.otago.ac.nz/
12. ISAD(G). General International Standard Archival Description. International Council on Archives. Ottawa, second edition, 1999.
13. J. Kamps and B. Sigurbjörnsson. What do users think of an XML element retrieval system? In Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation (INEX 2005), volume 3977 of LNCS, pages 411-421. Springer, 2006.
14. B. Larsen, S. Malik, and T. Tombros. The interactive track at INEX 2005. In Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation (INEX 2005), volume 3977. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2006.
15. B. Larsen, A. Tombros, and S. Malik. Is XML retrieval meaningful to users? searcher preferences for full documents vs. elements. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGIR Conference, pages 663-664, 2006.
16. S. Malik, C.-P. Klas, N. Fuhr, B. Larsen, and A. Tombros. Designing a user interface for interactive retrieval of structured documents: lessons learned from the INEX interactive track. In 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL), pages 291-302, 2006.
17. S. Malik, B. Larsen, and A. Tombros. Report on the INEX 2005 interactive track. SIGIR Forum, 41:67-74, 2007.
18. S. Malik, A. Tombros, and B. Larsen. The interactive track at INEX 2006. In Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems (INEX 2006), volume 4518 of LNCS, pages 387-399. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2007.
19. A. Rosenbusch. Are our users being served? a report on online archival databases. Archives and Manuscripts. 29:44-61, 2001.
20. B. Stockting. Time to settle down? EAD encoding principles in the access to archives programme (A2A) and the research library group's best practice guidelines. Journal of Archival Organization. 3:7-23, 2004.
21. Z. Szlávik, A. Tombros, and M. Lalmas. Feature- and query-based table of contents generation for XML documents. In 29th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR), pages 456-467, 2007.
22. J. Tague-Sutcliffe. The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation, revisited. Information Processing and Management, 28: 467-190, 1992.
23. A. Tombros, B. Larsen, and S. Malik. The interactive track at INEX 2004. In Advances in XML Information Retrieval, volume 3493 of LNCS, pages 410-423. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2005.
24. XML. Extensible markup language (xml) 1.0 (fourth edition), 2006. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/.
25. E. Yakel. Encoded archival description: Are finding aids boundary spanners or barriers for users? Journal of Archival Organization, 2: 63-77, 2004.
26. J. Zhang, K. N. Fachry, and J. Kamps. Access to Archival Finding Aids: Context Matters. In 12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL), volume 5173 of LNCS. Springer, 2008.