What is the evidence for use dependent learning after stroke?

Stroke

Volumn 40, Issue 3 SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages

  Kent, Thomas A ^a,c   Rutherford, Devon G ^a   Breier, Joshua I ^b   Papanicoloau, Andrew C ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal models; MEG; Stroke recovery; Synapse

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONVALESCENCE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEARNING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TRAINING;

APHASIA; BRAIN; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE THERAPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STROKE; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 62949234155     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534925     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Stroemer RP, Kent TA, Hulsebosch CE. Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats. Stroke. 1995;26:2135-2144.
2. Metz GA, Antonow-Schlorke I, Otto WW. Motor improvements after focal cortical ischemia in adult rats are mediated by compensatory mechanisms. Behav Brain Res. 2005;162:71-82.
3. Jones TA, Schallert T. Overgrowth and pruning of dendrites in adult rats recovering from neocortical damage. Brain Res. 1992;581:156-160.
4. Ivanco TL, Greenough WT. Physiological consequences of morphologically detectable synaptic plasticity: potential uses for examining recovery following damage. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:765-767.
5. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785-807.
6. Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, Taub T. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621.
7. Maher LM, Kendall D, Swearengin JA, Rodrigues A, Leon SA, Pingel K, Holland A, Rothi LJ. A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:843-852.
8. Roth WM. Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Rev Ed Res. 2001;71:365-392.
9. Moresella E, Krauss RM. The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. Am J Psychol. 2004;117:411-424.
10. Raymer AM, Ciampitti M, Holliway B, Singletary F, Blonder LX, Ketterson T, Andersen S, Lehnen J, Heilman KM, Rothi LJG. Semanticphonologic treatment for noun and verb retrieval impairments in aphasia. Neuropsycholog Rehab. 2007;17:244-270.
11. Kendall DL, Rosenbek JC, Heilman KM, Conway T, Klenberg K, Rothi LJG, Nadeau SE. Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain Language. 2008;105:1-17.
12. Wong PCM, Warrier CM, Penhune VB, Roy AK, Sadehh A, Parrish TB, Zatorre RJ. Volume of left Heschl's gyrus and linguistic pitch. Learning Cerebral Cortex. 2008;18:828-836.
13. Wong PCM, Perrachione TK, Parrish TB. Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Human Brain Mapping. 2007;28:995-1006.
14. Breier J, Maher LM, Schmadeke S, Kasan KM, Papanicolaou AC. Changes in language-specific brain activation after therapy for aphasia using magnetoencephalography: a case study. Neurocase. 2007;13: 169-177.
15. Papanicolaou AC, Pazo-Alvarez P, Castillo EM, Billingsley-Marshall RL, Breier JI, Swank PR, Buchanan S, McManis M, Clear T, Passaro AD. Functional neuroimaging with MEG: Normative language profiles. Neuroimage. 2006;33:326-342.