Empirical results from using custom-made software project control centers in industrial environments

ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 243-252

  Ciolkowski, Marcus ^a   Heidrich, Jens ^a   Simon, Frank ^b   Radicke, Mathias ^c  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b SQS AG   (Germany)

^c BRANDENBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Case study; Cost; Effectiveness; SPCC

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CASE STUDY; CONTROL CENTERS; EFFECTIVENESS; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; EXPLICIT MODELS; GOAL-ORIENTED; INDUSTRIAL CASE STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS; LESSONS LEARNED; MANAGEMENT SUPPORTS; PROJECT CONTROLS; SOFTWARE PROJECT CONTROL CENTERS; SPCC;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 62949229152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1414004.1414044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227-247.
2. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, D. 1994. The Experience Factory. Encyclopaedia of Software Engineering, 1, 469-476.
3. CAST. 2008. CAST Application Intelligence Platform. http://www. castsoftware.com/Product/AIP.aspx, last checked Feb 29, 2008.
4. st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), September 20-21, 2007, Madrid Spain, 314-323.
5. Davis, F.D. 1990. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
6. Few, S. 2004. Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. Analytical Press, USA, 2004.
7. Gibbs, W.W. 1994. Software's Chronic Crisis. Scientific American, 1994, 86-95.
8. rd Software Measurement European Forum, May 10-12, 2006, Rome, Italy, 47-60.
9. th Software Measurement European Forum, May 9-11, 2007, Rome, Italy, 19-32.
10. Hendrick, R., Kistler, D., and Valett, J. 1992. Software Management Environment (SME) - Concepts and Architecture (Revision 1). NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 551, Software Engineering Laboratory Series, Report SEL-89-103, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
11. ISO 9126. 2003. Software Engineering - Product Quality. Technical Report, ISO/IEC TR 9126, Geneva.
12. Kemper, H.G., Mehanna, W., Unger, C. 2006. Business Intelligence - Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen. Eine Einführung in die IT-basierte Managementunterstützung. Vieweg, Germany.
13. McGarry, F., Pajerski, R., Page, G., Waligora, S., Basili, V.R., and Zelkowitz, M.V. 1994. An Overview of the Software Engineering Laboratory. Software Engineering Laboratory Series Report SEL-94-005, Greenbelt, MD, USA.
14. Münch, J., Heidrich, J. 2004. Software Project Control Centers: Concepts and Approaches. Journal of Systems and Software, 70(1), 3-19.
15. Rombach, H.D. 1991. Practical benefits of goal-oriented measurement. Software Reliability and Metrics, 217-235.
16. th International Conference on Software Engineering, 288-298.
17. Simmons, D.B., Ellis, N.C., Fujihara, H., and Kuo, W. 1998. Software Measurement - A Visualization Toolkit for Project Control and Process Improvement. Prentice Hall Inc: New Jersey, USA.
18. nd Annual Software Engineering Workshop (SEW).
19. Torii, K., Matsumoto, K., Nakakoji, K., Takada, Y., Takada, S., and Shima, K. 1999. Ginger2: An Environment for Computer-Aided Empirical Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4), 474-492.
20. Tufte, E.R. 1990. Envisioning information. Graphics Press, USA.
21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
22. Zelazny, G. 2001. Say it with charts. McGraw-Hill, USA.