Joint appointments and the professoriate: Two houses but no home?

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-32

  Hart, Jeni ^a   Mars, Matthew M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinarity; joint appointments; Science education faculty

Indexed keywords

EID: 62949221606     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-008-9092-x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amey, M. J. (2004). Breaking out of the box: Interdisciplinary collaboration and faculty work. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
2. Bailey, F. G. (1977). Morality and expediency. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
4. T. Becher 1994 The significance of disciplinary differences Studies in Higher Education 19 2 151 161
5. A. Biglan 1973 The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas Journal of Applied Psychology 57 3 195 203
6. P. C. Boardman B. L. Ponomariov 2007 Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially relevant research The Journal of Higher Education 7 1 51 70
7. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8. V. Burris 2004 The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks American Sociological Review 69 1 239 264
9. Clark, B. R. (1970). The distinctive college: Reed, Antioch, and Swarthmore. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
10. Creamer, E. G., & Lattuca, L. R. (Eds.). (2005). Advancing faculty learning through interdisciplinary collaboration. New directions for teaching and learning, no. 102. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
12. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
13. D. F. Kuratko 2005 The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29 5 577 598
14. Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
15. L. R. Lattuca 2003 Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded definitions from college and university faculty History of Intellectual Culture 3 1 1 20
16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. M. M. Mars 2007 The diverse agendas of faculty within an institutionalized model of entrepreneurship education Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 10 1 43 62
18. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. National Academy of Sciences (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academies.
21. Schonlau, M., Fricker Jr, R. D., & Elliott, M. N. (2001). Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the web. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
22. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. K. Tobin 2007 Collective responsibilities for research in science education-The tenure process Cultural Studies of Science Education 1 3 417 421
24. H. L. Wilensky 1964 The professionalization of everyone The American Journal of Sociology 70 2 137 158
25. O. H. Ylijoki 2000 Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying: A case-study of four Finnish university departments Higher Education 39 3 339 362