A natural language processing approach to automatic plagiarism detection

SIGITE'07 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Information Technology Education Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 213-218

  Leung, Chi Hong ^a   Chan, Yuen Yan ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Natural language process; Plagiarism detection; Syntactic and semantic analysis

Indexed keywords

COMMON SOURCE; ELECTRONIC VERSIONS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NEW APPROACHES; PLAGIARISM DETECTION; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; SENTENCE STRUCTURES; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE; WORDNET;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS; THESAURI; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

SEMANTICS;

EID: 62949198590     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1324302.1324348     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Austin, P.K. Lexical Functional Grammar. In N.J. Smelser and P. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, pp. 8748-8754, 2001.
2. BalaSundaraRaman; I.S., and Sanjeeth K.R. Context Free Grammar for Natural Language Constructs - An implementation for Venpa Class of Tamil Poetry. In Proceedings of Tamil Internet (Chennai, August 22, 2003). International Forum for Information Technology in Tamil, 2003, 128-136.
3. Chomsky, N. Three models for the description of language. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions, 2, 3 (Sep. 1956), 113-124.
4. Culy, C. The Complexity of the Vocabulary of Bambara. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, (1985), 345-351.
5. Dalrymple, M. Lexical Functional Grammar, Syntax and Semantic, New York: Academic Press, 2001.
6. Fanning, K. Is honesty still the best policy? Junior Scholastic, 107, 17 (Apr. 2005), 8-9.
7. Fillmore, C.J. The Case for Case Reopened. Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 8, (1977), 59-81.
8. Kaplan, R.M. and Joan B. Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representations. In M. Dalrymple, R.M. Kaplan, III M., John t. and A. Zaenen (eds.), Formal issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 29-130, 1995.
9. King, M. Parsing Natural Language. Academic Press, 1983.
10. MacDonell, C. The problem of plagiarism, School Library Journal, 51, 1 (Jan. 2005), 35.
11. McCullen, C. Preventing digital plagiarism. Technology & Learning, 22, 9 (Apr. 2002), 8.
12. Murphy, T. The emergence of texture: An analysis of the functions of the nominal demonstratives in an English interlanguage corpus, Language Learning & Technology, 5, 3 (Sept., 2001), 152-173. (Pubitemid 38817332)
13. Murray, W. The plagiarism phenomenon. E.learning Age, (Oct 2006), 22-25.
14. Pullum, G.K., and Gerald G. Natural languages and contextfree languages. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, (1982), 471-504.
15. Roach, R. Rutgers tests Internet plagiarism software. Black Issues in Higher Education, 18, 16 (Sep. 2001), 45.
16. Royce, J. Has turnitin.com got it all wrapped up? Teacher Librarian, 30, 4 (Apr. 2003), 26-30.
17. Shieber, S. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 91985), 333-343.
18. Sparck Jones, K. and Wilks, Y.A. Automatic Natural Language Parsing. Ellis Horwood, 1983.
19. Townley, C. and Parsell, M. Technology and academic virtue: Student plagiarism through the looking glass, Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 4 (2004), 271-277.