Energy Consumption Modeling and Optimization for Production Machines

2008 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, ICSET 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 574-579

  Dietmair, Anton ^a   Verl, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES; DESIGN AND OPERATIONS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; EXISTING ENERGIES; MODELING AND OPTIMIZATIONS; MODELING FORMALISMS; PRODUCTION MACHINES;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 62949187631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSET.2008.4747073     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Energieflussbild 2005 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland in Mio t SKE, Arbeitgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen, September 2006.
2. Umweltdaten Deutschland, Umweltbundesamt, Germany, 2007.
3. Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, July 6, 2005. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/eco-design/ dir2005-32.htm
4. Study for preparing the first working plan of the ecodesign directive, Report No. ENTR/06/ 026, 2007. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise /eco-design/finalreport-wpstudy.pdf
5. E. Abele, U. Hermenau, and S. Feickert, "Methodology for the life cycle inventory of machined parts during the product development process," in Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development, B. Hon, Ed., Wiley, Chichester, 2003, pp. 147-151.
6. Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework, ISO 14040 standard, 2006.
7. Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines, ISO 14044 standard, 2006.
8. International Performance Measurment and Verification Protocol (IPMVP), Efficiency Valuation Organisation, San Francisco, 1997.
9. P. Bertoldi and S. Kromer, "Efficiency Valuation - Concepts and Practice," Proceedings of the 2005 ECEEE, Panel 5, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2005.
10. E. Kober, H. Wohlgemuth, R. Kademann, K. Herfurth, " Variantenvergleich für den Material- und Energieaufwand: Spanen aus Halbzeug oder endkonturnahes Gießen," konstruieren + gießen, vol. 22, no. 4, 1997, pp.18-24.
11. Typischer Energiefluss einer guten Produktionsmaschine, BFK RAVEL 724.397.12.54 D, 2000. Available: http://www.energie.ch/themen/ industrie/infel/maschinen.htm.
12. D. P. Sekulic and J. Sankara, "Advanced thermodynamics metrics for sustainability assessment of open engineering systems," Thermal Science, vol. 10, no.1, 2006, pp.125-140.
13. P. Sekler, A. Dietmair, A. Dadalau, H. Rüdele, J. Zulaika, J. Smolik, and A. Bustillo, "Energieeffiziente Maschinen durch Massenreduktion," wt Werkstattstechnik online, vol. 97, no. 5, 2007, pp.320-327.
14. A. Dietmair and A. Verl, "Energy Consumption Forecasting and Optimisation for Tool Machines," Proc. MATAR2008, Prague, 2008.
15. F. Draganescu, M. Gheorghe, and C. V. Doicin, "Models of machine tool efficiency and specific consumed energy," Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 141, 2003, pp. 9-15.
16. A. Dietmair and A. Verl, "A generic energy consumption model," Proc. FAIM 2008, 2008.
17. Q. Qiu and M. Pedram, "Dynamic power management based on continuous-time Markov decision processes", Proc. 36th ACM/IEEE Conf. Design Automation, 1999, pp. 555-561.
18. B. Kuhrke and S. Rothenbücher, "Vermeiden von Stand-by-Zeiten verbessert die Energieeffizienz von Maschinen," MM, no. 31/32, 2008, pp.32-34.