Adding provenance and evolution information to modularized argumentation models

Proceedings - 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 475-481

  Groza, Tudor ^a   Handschuh, Siegfried ^a   Breslin, John G ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY;

ABSTRACT MODELS; ARGUMENTATION MODELS; ARGUMENTATION SEMANTICS; MODULARIZED; SOCIAL SOFTWARES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 62949097242     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WIIAT.2008.258     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. J. Bentahar, Z. Maamar, D. Benslimane, and P. Thiran. An Argumentation Framework for Communities of Web Services. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6), 2007.
2. J. Breslin, S. Decker, A. Harth, and U. Bojars. SIOC: An Approach to Connect Web-Based Communities. The International Journal of Web-Based Communities, 2(2), 6 2006.
3. P. Buitelaar, T. Declerck, A. Frank, S. Racioppa, M. Kiesel, M. Sintek, R. Engel, M. Romanelli, D. Sonntag, B. Loos, V. Micelli, R. Porzel, and P. Cimiano. LingInfo: Design and Applications of a Model for the Integration of Linguistic Information in Ontologies. In Proceedings of OntoLex06, a Workshop at LREC, Genoa, Italy, 2006.
4. L. M. Carlson. Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983.
5. P. R. Cohen and C. R. Perrault. Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts. Cognitive Science, 3:177-212, 1979.
6. J. Conklin and M. L. Begeman. gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Team Design Deliberation. In HYPERTEXT '87: Proceeding of the ACM conference on Hypertext, pages 247-251. ACM Press, 1987.
7. A. Gangemi. Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005). Springer Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg, 2005.
8. T. Gordon. The Zeno Argumentation Framework. In Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law 1997, 1997.
9. T. Groza, S. Handschuh, K. Möller, and S. Decker. SALT - Semantically Annotated LATEX for Scientific Publications. In ESWC 2007, Innsbruck, Austria, 2007.
10. W. Kunz and H. Rittel. Issues as elements of information system. Working paper 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, 1970.
11. C. Mancini, D. Scott, and S. B. Shum. Visualising Discourse Coherence in Non-Linear Documents. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 47(1):101-108, 2006.
12. C. Mancini and S. B. Shum. Modelling discourse in contested domains: a semiotic and cognitive framework. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 64(11):1154-1171, 2006.
13. W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson. Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Technical Report RS-87-190, Information Science Institute, 1987.
14. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, 1995.
15. C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Magdalene College, University of Cambridge, 1923.
16. A. L. Rector. Modularisation of Domain Ontologies Implemented in Description Logics and related formalisms including OWL. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2003), pages 121-129. ACM Press, 2003.
17. C. Tempich, H. S. Pinto, Y. Sure, and S. Staab. An Argumentation Ontology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILI-GENT). In ESWC 2005, pages 241-256, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May, 2005.
18. P. Torroni, M. Gavanelli, and F. Chesani. Argumentation in the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6), 2007.