Response to hewes's "the influence of communication processes on group outcomes: Antithesis and Thesis"

Human Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 279-285

  Gouran, Dennis S ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749154594     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01349.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Beach, L. R. Connolly, T 2008). The psychology of decision making: People in organizations (2nd ed Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
2. Beach, L. R. Mitchell, T. R 1996). Image theory: The unifying perspective. In L. R. Beach (Ed Decision-making in the workplace: A unified perspective (pp. 1 20). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
3. Bergman, G 1957 Philosophy of science. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Fisher, B. A. Hawes, L. C 1971). An interact system model: Generating a grounded theory of small groups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 444 453.
5. Gouran, D. S 1974). Discussion: The process of group decision making. New York : Harper & Row.
6. Gouran, D. S 1999). Communication in groups: The emergence and evolution of a field of study. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran M. S. Poole (Eds The handbook of group communication theory & research (pp. 3 36). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
7. Gouran, D. S., Hirokawa, R. Y., Julian, K. M. Leatham, G. B 1993). The evolution and current status of the functional perspective on communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups. In S. A. Deetz (Ed Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 573 600). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
8. Hewes, D. E 1986). A socio-egocentric model of group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and group decision-making (pp. 265 291). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
9. Hewes, D. E 1996). Small group communication may not influence decision making: An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In R. Y. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 179 212). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
10. Hirokawa, R. Y. Poole, M. S Eds 1986). Communication and group decision-making. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
11. Hirokawa, R. Y. Poole, M. S Eds 1996). Communication and group decision making (2nd ed Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
12. Kaplan, A 1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco : Chandler.
13. Meyers, R. A. Brashers, D 1998). Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link. Communication Monographs, 65, 261 281.
14. Poole. M. S 1999). Group communication theory. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran M. S. Poole (Eds The handbook of group communication theory & research (pp. 37 70). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
15. Tschan, F 1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371 393.