Elaborations on the socioegocentric and dual-level connectionist models of group interaction processes

Human Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 304-308

  Hewes, Dean E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749143010     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01352.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bales, R. F. Strodbeck, F 1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485 495.
2. Brown, P. Levinson, S 1987). Politeness. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
3. Dewey, J 1921). How we think. Boston : D.C. Heath.
4. Dion, K., Baron, R. Miller, N 1978). Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed Group processes (pp. 227 300). New York : Academic.
5. Dugosh, K., Paulus, P., Roland, E. Yang, H 2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722 735.
6. Fink. E., Kaplovitz, S. Hubbard, S 2002). Oscillations in beliefs and decisions. In J. Dillard M. Pfau (Eds The persuasion handbook (pp. 17 38). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
7. Hogg, M. Tindale, S Eds 2001). Group processes. Maldon, MA : Blackwell.
8. Pavitt, C. Johnson, K 1999). An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research, 26, 303 321.
9. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. McPhee, R 1982). A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision-making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions. Communication Monographs, 49, 1 19.
10. Tesser, A 1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed Advances in social psychology, 21, 188 227.