Anova expansions and efficient sampling methods for parameter dependent nonlinear PDES

International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 256-273

  Cao, Yanzhao ^a   Chen, Zheng ^b   Gunzburger, Max ^c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ANOVA expansions; Nonlinear partial differential equations; Parameter sampling methods; Surrogate optimization

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749132315     PISSN: 17055105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M. BARRAULT, Y. MADAY, N. NGUYEN, AND A. PATERA, An 'empirical interpolation' method: Application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser, 1 339, 2004, 667-672.
2. R. CAFLISCH, W. MOROKOFF, A. OWEN, Valuation of Mortgage backed securities using Brownian bridges to reduce effective dimension, J. Comp. Finan. 1, 1997, 27-46.
3. Q. DU, V. FABER, AND M. GUNZBERGER, Centroidal Voronoi tessellations: Applications and algorithms, SIAM Rev. 41, 1999, 637-676.
4. M. GREPL AND A. PATERA, A posteriori error bounds for reduced-basis approximations of parametrized parabolic partial differential equations, ESAIM:M2AN 39, 2005, 157-181.
5. C. GU, Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models, Springer, Berlin, 2002.
6. J. HALTON, On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multidimensional integrals, Numer. Math. 2 1960, 84-90.
7. J. HAMMERSLEY, Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 86, 1960, 844-874.
8. F. HICKERNELL, Lattice rules: How well do they measure up?, in Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets, P. Hellekalek and G. Larcher, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1998, 109-166.
9. G. HOOKER, Generalized functional ANOVA diagnostics for high-dimensional functions of dependent variables, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 16, 2007, 709-732.
10. L. JU, Q. DU, and M. GUNZBERGER, Probablistic methods for centroidal Voronoi tessellations and their parallel implementations, J. Parallel Comput. 28, 2002, 1477-1500.
11. J. Kleijnen, Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 111, 2008.
12. K. KUNISCH AND S. VOLKWEIN, Control of Burger's equation by a reduced order approach using proper orthogonal decomposition, JOTA 102, 1999, 345-371.
13. K. KUNISCH AND S. VOLKWEIN, Galerkin proper orthogonal decomposition methods for parabolic problems, Spezialforschungsbereich F003 Optimierung und Kontrolle, Projektbereich Kontinuierliche Optimierung und Kontrolle, Bericht Nr. 153, Graz, 1999.
14. O. LE MAITRE, O. KNIO, H. NAJM, and R. GHANEM, A stochastic projection method for fluid flow. I. Basic formulation, J. Comput. Phys. 173, 2001, 481-511.
15. D. NAGY, Modal representation of geometrically nonlinear behavior by the finite element method, Comput. Struct. 10, 1979, 693.
16. H. NIEDERREITER, Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992.
17. A. NOOR, Recent advances in reduction methods for nonlinear problems, Comput. Struc. 13, 1981, 31-44.
18. A. OWEN, The dimension distribution and quadrature test functions, Stat. Sinica 13, 2003, 1-18.
19. H. PARK AND W. LEE, An efficient method of solving the Navier-Stokes equations for flow control, Inter. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg. 41, 1998, 1133-1151.
20. J. PETERSON, The reduced basis method for incompressible viscous flow calculations, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 10, 1989, 777-786.
21. S. RAVINDRAN, Proper orthogonal decomposition in optimal control of fluids, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 34, 2000, 425-448.
22. J. RODRÍGUEZ AND L. SIROVICH, Low-dimensional dynamics for the complex Ginzburg-Landau equations, Physica D 43, 1990, 77-86.
23. Y. SAKA, M. GUNZBERGER, AND J. BURKARDT, Latinized, improved LHS, and CVT point sets in hypercubes, to appear.
24. A. SALTELLI, K. CHAN, AND E. SCOTT, Sensitivity Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, 2000.
25. I. SOBOL', Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Math. Comp. Simul. 55 2001, 271-280.
26. S. VOLKWEIN, Optimal control of a phase field model using the proper orthogonal decomposition, ZAMM 81, 2001, 83-97.
27. X. WANG AND K. Fang, The effective dimension and quasi-Monte Carlo integration, J. Complex. 19 2003, 101-124.
28. D. XIU AND G. KARNIADAKIS, Modeling uncertainty in steady state diffusion problems via generalized polynomial chaos, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 191, 2002, 4927-4948.
29. D. XIU AND G. KARNIADAKIS, Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos, J. Comp. Phys. 187, 2003, 137-167.