A secure non-interactive deniable authentication protocol with strong deniability based on discrete logarithm problem and its application on internet voting protocol

Information Technology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 302-309

  Meng, Bo ^a  

^a SOUTH CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOR NATIONALITIES   (China)

Author keywords

Cryptography; Mutual authentication; Receipt freeness; Security protocol; Strong physical assumption

Indexed keywords

DENIABLE AUTHENTICATIONS; DISCRETE LOGARITHM PROBLEMS; FORGERY ATTACKS; INTERNET VOTING PROTOCOLS; MAN-IN-THE-MIDDLE ATTACKS; MUTUAL AUTHENTICATION; NON-INTERACTIVE DENIABLE AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOLS; RECEIPT-FREENESS; SECURITY PROPERTIES; SECURITY PROTOCOL; STRONG PHYSICAL ASSUMPTION;

ALGEBRA; AUTHENTICATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; INTERNET;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 62749124406     PISSN: 18125638     EISSN: 18125646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/itj.2009.302.309     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acquisti, A., 2004. Receipt-free homomorphic elections and write-in voter verified ballots. Technical Report 2004/105, International Association for Crypto logic Research, May 2, 2004 and Carnegie Mellon Institute for Software Research International, CMU-ISRI-04-116, 2004. http://www.heinz.cmu. edu/̃acquisti/papers/acquisti-.
2. Aumann, Y. and M. Rabin, 1998. Efficient deniable authentication of long messages. Proceedings of the International Conference on Theoretical Computer Science in Honor of Professor Manuel Blum's 60thBirthday, 1998. http://www.cs.cityu.edu hk/dept/v ideo. htm 1.
3. Baudron, O., P. A. Fouque, D. Pointcheval, G. Poupard and S. lacques, 2001. Practical multi-candidate election system. Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 2001, ACM, New York, USA., pp: 274-283.
4. Benaloh, I. and D. Tuinstra, 1994. Receipt-free secretballot elections. Proceeding of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, May 23-25, ACM, New York, USA., pp: 544-553.
5. Chaum, D.L., 1981. Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses and digital pseudonyms. Commun. ACM, 24: 84-88.
6. Deng, X., C.H. Lee and H. Zhu, 2001. Deniable authentication protocols. IEE Proc. Comput. Digital Techniques, 148: 101-104.
7. Dwork, C, M. Naor and A. Sahai, 1998. Concurrent zero knowledge. Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1998, USA., pp: 409-418.
8. Fan, L., C.X. Xu and I.H. Li, 2002. Deniable authentication protocol based on Diffie-Hellman algorithm. Elect. Lett, 38: 705-706.
9. Feng, T. and I.F. Ma, 2007. Universally composable security concurrent deniable authentication based on witness indistinguishable. I. Software, 18: 2871-2881.
10. Goulet, I. and I. Zitelli, 2004. Surveying and improving electronic voting schemes, http://www.seas.upenn. edu/̃cse400/CSE400-2004-2005/senior- design-pr ojects-04-05.htm.
11. Han, S., W. Liu and E. Chang, 2004. Deniable authentication protocol resisting man-in-the-middle attack. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2004, pp: 292-295.
12. Juels, A. and M. lakobsson, 2002. Coercion-resistant electronic elections, 2002. http://www.vote auctιon.net/VOTEAUCTION/165.pdf
13. Lee, W.B., C.C. Wu and W.J. Tsaur, 2007. A novel deniable authentication protocol using generalized ElGamal signature scheme. Inform. Sci., 177: 1376-1381.
14. Lu, R. andZ. Cao, 2005a. A new deniable authentication protocol from bilinear pairings. Applied Math. Comput, 168: 954-961.
15. Lu, R. and Z. Cao, 2005b. Non-interactive deniable authentication protocol based on factoring. Comput. Standards Interfaces, 27: 401-405.
16. Meng, B., 2007. An internet voting protocol with receipt free and coercion-resistant. Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Oct. 16-19, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA., pp: 721-726.
17. Meng, B., 2008. Formal analysis of key properties in the internet voting protocol using applied pi calculus. Inform. Technol. J., 7: 1133-1140.
18. Okamoto, T., 1997. Receipt-free electronic voting schemes for large scale elections. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Security Protocols, Apr. 7-9, Springer-Verlag, London, UK., pp: 25-35.
19. Qian, H.F., Z.F. Cao, L.C. Wang and Q.S. Xue, 2005. Efficient non-interactive deniable authentication protocols. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Sept. 21-23, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC. USA., pp: 673-679.
20. Raimondo, M.D. and R. Gennaro, 2005. New approaches for deniable authentication. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Nov. 7-11, ACM Press, New York, pp: 112-121.
21. Shao, Z., 2004. Efficient deniable authentication protocol based on generalized ElGamal signature scheme. Comput. Standards Interfaces, 26: 449-454.
22. Shi, Y. and J. Li, 2005. Identity-based deniable authentication protocol. Electron. Lett, 41: 241-242.
23. Zhu, R.W., D.S. Wong and C.H. Lee, 2006. Cryptanalysis of a suite of deniable authentication protocols. IEEE Commun. Lett., 10: 504-506.