Mining maximum consensus sequences from group ranking data

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 198, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 241-251

  Chen, Yen Liang ^a   Cheng, Li Chen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Data mining; Decision making; Group decision making; Maximum consensus sequence

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MAXIMUM CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; NEW CONCEPTS; SYNTHETIC DATA SETS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 62749091652     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Antonie S., and Silva A.P.D. Stochastic judgments in the AHP: The measurement of rank reversal probabilities. Decision Sciences 28 3 (1997) 655
2. Bartholdi J., Tovey C.A., and Trick M.A. Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice and Welfare 6 2 (1989) 57-165
3. Beg M.M.S., and Ahmad N. Soft computing techniques for rank aggregation on the World Wide Web. World Wide Web-Internet and Web Information Systems 6 1 (2003) 5-22
4. J.C. Borda, Memoire sur les elections au scrutin, Histoire de l Academie Royale de Science, 1981, Paris.
5. Bogart K. Preference structures I: Distances between transitive preference relations. Journal of Math Sociology 3 (1973) 49-67
6. Bogart K. Preference structures II: Distances between asymmetric relations. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 29 2 (1975) 254-265
7. Cohen W. Learning to order things. The Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10 (1999) 43
8. Cook W.D. Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking. European Journal of Operational Research 172 2 (2006) 369-385
9. Cook W.D., Golany B., Kress M., Penn M., and Raviv T. Optimal allocation of proposals to reviewers to facilitate effective ranking. Management Science 51 4 (2005) 655-661
10. Cook W.D., Golany B., Kress M., Penn M., and Raviv T. Creating a consensus ranking of proposals from reviewer's partial ordinal rankings. Computers and OR 34 4 (2007) 954-965
11. Cook W.D., Kress M., Seiford L., and orders A.a.a.t.d.o.p. Revue Automatique. Informatique et Recherche Operationnelle 20 2 (1986) 115-122
12. Cook W.D., Kress M., and Seiford L. Information and preference in partial orders: A bimatrix representation. Psychometrika 51 2 (1986) 197-207
13. Cook W.D., Kress M., and Seiford L. A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models. European Journal of Operational Research 96 (1996) 392-397
14. Fagin R., Kumar R., and Sivakumar D. Efficient similarity search and classification via rank aggregation. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (2003), ACM, San Diego, California 301-312
15. Golden B. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies (1989), Springer, New York
16. Gonzalez-Pachon J., and Romero C. Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: An interval goal programming approach. Computers and Operations Research 28 8 (2001) 827-834
17. Greco S., Mousseau V., and Slowinski R. Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 191 2 (2008) 416-436
18. Hochbaum D.S., and Levin A. Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Science 52 9 (2006) 1394-1408
19. Jacquet-Lagr'eze E., and Siskos Y. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10 (1982) 151-164
20. J.G. Kemeny, L.J. Snell, Preference ranking: An axiomatic approach, in: Proceedings of Mathematical Models in the Social Science, 1962, pp. 9-23.
21. Kendall M. Rank Correlation Methods (1955), Hafner, New York
22. Koksalan M., and Taner V. An approach for finding the most preferred alternative in the presence of multiple criteria. European Journal of Operational Research 60 1 (1992) 53-60
23. Lewis H.S., and Butler T.W. An interactive framework for multi-person, multiobjective decisions. Decision Sciences 24 1 (1993)
24. Saaty T.L. Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process. Decision Sciences 18 2 (1987) 157
25. Saint S., and Lawson J.R. Rules for Reaching Consensus: A Modern Approach to Decision Making (1994), Pfeiffer& Company
26. R. Srikant, R. Agrawal, Mining sequential patterns: Generalizations and performance improvements, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), Avignon, France, 1996.
27. Vaidya O.S., and Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169 1 (2006) 1-29