Science to practice: Can the combination of resting first-pass myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular MR imaging help identify myocardial infarction resulting from coronary microembolization?

Radiology

Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 609-611

  Appelbaum, Evan ^a   Manning, Warren J ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTION; HEART MUSCLE NECROSIS; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MICROEMBOLISM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST; SYSTOLIC DYSFUNCTION;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; CORONARY VESSELS; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; GELATIN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; SCIENCE; SWINE;

EID: 62649173747     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2503082001     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carlsson M, Wilson M, Martin AJ, Saeed M. Myocardial microinfarction after coronary microembolization in swine: MR imaging characterization. Radiology 2009;250(3): 703-713.
2. Califf RM, Abdelmeguid AE, Kuntz RE, et al. Myonecrosis after revascularization procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(2):241- 251.
3. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR. First- pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174(3 pt 1): 757-762.
4. Masui T, Saeed M, Wendland MF, Higgins CB. Occlusive and reperfused myocardial infarcts: MR imaging differentiation with nonionic Gd-DTPA-BMA. Radiology 1991; 181(1):77-83.
5. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation 1995;92(7):1902-1910.
6. Kwong RY, Chan AK, Brown KA, et al. Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2006;113(23):2733-2743.
7. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97(8):765-772.
8. Porto I, Selvanayagam JB, Van Gaal WJ, et al. Plaque volume and occurrence and location ofperiprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade analysis, and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006;114(7):662-669.
9. Selvanayagam JB, Cheng AS, Jerosch- Herold M, et al. Effect of distal embolization on myocardial perfusion reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention: a quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion study. Circulation 2007;116(13):1458-1464.
10. Steuer J, Bjerner T, Duvernoy O, et al. Visualisation and quantification of peri-operative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2004;25(15):1293-1299.