Improving finger force control with vibrational haptic feedback for multiple sclerosis

Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference on Telehealth and Assistive Technologies, Telehealth/AT 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 110-115

  Jiang, Li ^a   Cutkosky, Mark R ^a   Ruutiainen, Juhani ^b   Raisamo, Roope ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Maskun Neurologinen Kuntoutuskeskus   (Finland)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Force sensing; Haptic feedback; Multiple sclerosis; Rehabilitation; Vibration

Indexed keywords

FORCE SENSING; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; REHABILITATION; VIBRATION;

FORCE CONTROL; HAPTIC INTERFACES; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 62649132074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. E. Bilodeau and I. Bilodeau. Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. J. Exp. Psychol, 58:142-144, 1959.
2. E. Bilodeau and I. Bilodeau. Motor-skills learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 12:243-280, 1961.
3. R. F. Boian, J. E. Deutsch, C. Lee, G. C. Burdea, and J. Lewis. Haptic effects for virtual reality-based poststroke rehabilitation. In HAPTICS'03, 2003.
4. J. Brown. A proposed program of research on psychological feedback(knowledge of results) in the performance of psychomotor tasks. Proc. Res. Plann. Conf. Percept. Mot. Skills, AF HRRC Conf. Rep., 49, 1949.
5. C. G. Burgar, P. S. Lum, P. C. Shor, and H. Van der Loos. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: The palo alto va/stanford experience. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6):663-673, 2000.
6. G. D. Garson. Univariate glm, anova, and ancova from statnotes: Topics in multivariabe analysis. In http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/anova. htm, volume 2007, 2007.
7. D. E. Goodkin, D. Hertsgaard, and J. Seminary. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69:850- 854, 1988.
8. W. B. Griffin, W. R. Provancher, and M. R. Cutkosky. Feedback strategies for telemanipulation with shared control of object handling forces. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ., 14(6):720-731, 2005.
9. J. Lieberman and C. Breazeal. Tikl: Development of a wearable vibrotactile feedback suit for improved human motor learning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):919-926, October, 2007.
10. A. M. Murray, R. L. Klatzky, and P. K. Khosla. Psychophysical characterization and testbed validation of a wearable vibrotactile glove for telemanipulation. Presence, 12(2):156-182, 2003.
11. M. Rocca, B. Colombo, A. Falini, A. Ghezzi, V. Martinelli, G. Scotti, G. Comi, and M. Filippi. Cortical adaptation in patients with ms: a cross-sectional functional mri-study of diseases phenotypes. Lancet Neurol, 4:618-626, 2005.
12. R. A. Rudick, G. Cutter, and S. Reingold. The multiple sclerosis functional composite a new clinical outcome measure for multiple sclerosis trials. Multiple Sclerosis, 8:359-365, 2002.