Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 43-50

  Paterson, Kevin B ^a   Liversedge, Simon P ^b   Davis, Colin J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SACCADES; SEMANTICS;

EID: 62649126676     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.43     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked orthographic priming in bilingual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 447-457.
4. Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83-99.
5. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005a). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 131-143.
6. Bowers, J. S., Davis, C. J., & Hanley, D. A. (2005b). Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition, 97, B45-B54.
7. Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., & van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 65-85.
8. Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of the orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
9. Colombo, L. (1986). Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 226-234.
10. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic ̌ (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales.
12. Davis, C. J. (2003). Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 121-172). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
13. Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70.
14. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 668-687.
15. Davis, C. J., & Taft, M. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 904-910.
16. De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research, 63, 159-162.
17. Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1098-1116.
18. Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 696-713.
19. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency ef-fects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 228-244.
20. Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 370-384.
21. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 218-233.
22. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
23. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word identification: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
24. Huntsman, L. A., & Lima, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 417-429.
25. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 55-75). New York: Elsevier.
26. Lupker, S. J., & Colombo, L. (1994). Inhibitory effects in form priming: Evaluating a phonological competition explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 437-451.
27. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
28. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood fre-quency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 767-779.
29. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1142-1158.
30. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eyemovement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56.
31. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
32. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
33. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
34. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
35. Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 65-76.
36. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339-363.
37. Williams, C. C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1072-1082.