Come together, right now: The group therapist as clinician-researcher

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 577-584

  Greene, Les R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GROUP DYNAMICS; GROUP THERAPY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STAFF; ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

EID: 62649120476     PISSN: 00207284     EISSN: 00207284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.4.575     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Borckardt, J., Nash, M., Murphy, M., Moore, M., Shaw, D., & O"Neil, P. (2008). Clinical practice as a natural laboratory for psychotherapy research: A guide to case-based time-series analysis. American Psychologist, 63, 77-95.
2. Fishman, D. (2005) From single case to database: A new method for enhancing psychotherapy practice. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 1.
3. Hardy, G. (2007). Researchers and practitioners working together: Process studies at a research center. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 42, 21-24.
4. Hornsey, M.J., Dwyer, L., Oei, T.P.S., & Dingle, G. (in press). Group processes and outcomes in group psychotherapy: Is it time to let go of "cohesiveness"? International Journal of Group Psychotherapy.
5. Johnson, J. (2007). Cohesion, alliance, and outcome in group psychotherapy: Comments on Joyce, Piper & Ogrodniczuk (2007). International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 57, 533-540.
6. Kazdin, A. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146-159.
7. Lorentzen, S. (2008). Cohesion, alliance, and outcome in group psychotherapy: Comments on Joyce et al. (2007) and Johnson (2007). International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58, 403-409.
8. Lorentzen, S., Sexton, H.C., & Hoglend P. (2004). Therapeutic alliance, cohesion, and outcome in a long-term analytic group: A preliminary study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 58, 33-40.
9. McDermut, W., Miller, I.W.,& Brown, R.A. (2001). The effcacy of group psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis and review of the empirical research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 98-116.
10. Newton, P.M., & Levenson, D. (1973). The work group within the organization: A sociopsychological approach. Psychiatry, 36, 115-141.
11. Persons, J. B. (2006). Psychotherapists collect data during routine clinical work that can contribute to knowledge about mechanisms of change in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 244-246.
12. Sutton, A. (2005). Contributing to a treatment trial of group therapy: 'Psychotherapy Supervisor' or 'Therapeutic Consultant'? Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 19, 121-134.
13. Westen, D. (2007) Discovering what works in the community: Toward a genuine partnership of clinicians and researchers. In S.G. Hofmann & J. Weinberger (Eds.) The art and science of psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.
14. Westen, D., & Morrison, K. (2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatments for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical examination of the status of empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 875-899.
15. Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, fndings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631-663.
16. Yanos, P.T., & ziedonis, D.M. (2006). The patient-oriented clinician-researcher: Advantages and challenges of being a double agent. Psychiatric Services, 57, 249-253.