Overblocking autonomy: The case of mandatory library filtering software

Continental Philosophy Review

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-100

  Hull, Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Child Internet Protection Act; Hetero normativity; Internet; Library filtering; Privacy; Public sphere; Sexuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 62549142218     PISSN: 13872842     EISSN: 15731103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11007-009-9097-x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ALA. 2002. Brief for the United States. U.S. Briefs 361.
2. American Library Association v. U. S., 201 F. Supp. 2d 401 (E.D. Pa. 2002).
3. Bell, Derrick A. 1996. Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. In Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement, ed. Kimberle Crenshaw, et al., 5-19. New York: New Press.
4. Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition, and Jürgen Habermas. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 73-98. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Yochai Benkler 2003 Through the looking glass: Alice and the constitutional foundations of the public domain Law and Contemporary Problems 66 173 224
6. Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7. Berkowitz, Howard. 1999. Hate on the internet: The Anti-Defamation League perspective. Prepared Statement to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 14 Sept 1999.
8. Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982).
9. Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
10. James Boyle 1997 Foucault in cyberspace: Surveillance, sovereignty, and hardwired censors University of Cincinnati Law Review 66 177 205
11. Brief of cities, mayors and county commissioners as amicus curiae in support of appellants. 2002. U.S. Briefs 361.
12. Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
13. Calhoun, Craig (ed.). 1992. Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Robert Cannon 1996 The legislative history of Senator Exon's Communications Decency Act: Regulating barbarians on the information superhighway Federal Communications Law Journal 49 51 94
15. Children's Internet Protection Act [CIPA], 20 USC 9134(f) (Public Law 106-554).
16. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2006. Control and freedom: Power and paranoia in the age of fiber optics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
17. Clark, Andy. 2003. Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Julia Cohen 1996 A right to read anonymously: A closer look at "Copyright Management" in cyberspace Connecticut Law Review 28 981 1039
19. William E Connolly 2005 The evangelical capitalist resonance machine Political Theory 33 869 886
20. Doherty, Kelly M. 1999. www.obscenity.com: An analysis of obscenity and indecency regulation on the internet. Akron Law Review 32: 259-281.
21. E-Rate and filtering: A review of the Children's Internet Protection Act, Hearing of the Telecommunications and the Internet Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. April 4, 2001 (available on Lexis).
22. Richard H Fallon Jr 1994 Two senses of autonomy Stanford Law Review 46 875 905
23. Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans:Sheridan, Alan). New York: Vintage.
24. Fraser, Nancy. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 109-142. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. Adam Goldstein 2002 Like a sieve: The Child Internet Protection Act and ineffective filters in libraries Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 12 1187 1202
26. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.
28. Haselton, Bennett. 2000. Amnesty intercepted: Global human rights groups blocked by web censoring software. http://www.peacefire.org/amnesty-intercepted/ . Accessed Jan 2009.
29. Hayles, N.Katherine. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Gordon Hull 2003 Thoughts on the fetishization of cyberspeech and the turn from "public" to "private" law Constellations 10 113 134
31. Gordon Hull 2005 Capital sive natura: Spinoza and the immanence of Empire International Studies in Philosophy 37 29 48
32. Lucas D Introna Helen Nissenbaum 2000 Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters TIS 16 169 185
33. Latour, Bruno. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, ed. Wiebe E. Bijker, and John Law, 225-258. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Gregory K Laughlin 2003 Sex, lies, and library cards: The first amendment implications of the use of software filters to control access to internet pornography in public libraries Drake University Law Review 51 213 282
35. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
36. Mark A Lemley 2003 Place and cyberspace California Law Review 91 521 542
37. Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
38. Levesque, Roger J.R. 2000. Adolescents, sex, and the law: Preparing adolescents for responsible citizenship. Washington: American Psychological Association.
39. Catherine A Mackinnon 1995 Vindication and resistance: A response to the Carnegie Mellon study of pornography in cyberspace Georgetown University Law Journal 83 1959 1967
40. Mainstream Loudoun v. Board of Trustees of Loudon County Library, 24 F. Supp. 2d 552 (E.D. Va. 1998).
41. McCarthy, Thomas. 1992. Practical discourse: On the relation of morality to politics. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 51-72. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. McCreary v. ACLU Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005).
43. Mosco, Vincent. 2004. The digital sublime: Myth, power and cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44. Pew Internet and American Life Project. 2009. http://www.pewInternet.org/ . Accessed Jan 2009.
45. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
46. Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement (trans: Rose, Julie). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Reno v. ACLU, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
48. Resnick, Paul. 2002. See no evil: How internet filters affect the search for online health information. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/ content/2002/20021210a/. Accessed June 2008.
49. Marty Rimm 1995 Marketing pornography on the information superhighway: A survey of 917, 410 images, descriptions, short stories, animations downloaded 8.5 million times by consumers in over cities in forty countries, provinces, and territories Georgetown Law Journal 83 1849 1925
50. Catherine J Ross 2000 Anything goes: Examining the state's interest in protecting children from controversial speech Vanderbilt Law Review 53 427 524
51. Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991).
52. Riva Siegel 1992 Reasoning from the body: A historical perspective on abortion regulation and the question of equal protection Stanford Law Review 44 261 381
53. Edward Stein 2003 Queers anonymous: Lesbians, gay men, free speech, and cyberspace Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 38 159 213
54. Cass R Sunstein 1995 Incompletely theorized agreements Harvard Law Review 108 1733 1772
55. Cass R Sunstein 1996 Social norms and social roles Columbia Law Review 96 903 968
56. Tiziana Terranova 2000 Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy Social Text 63 33 58
57. Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet, 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.
58. U.S v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003).
59. Elisabeth Young-Breuhl 2002 Homophobias: A diagnostic and political manual Constellations 9 263 273