A framework for ecosystem services valuation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 494-496

  Martin, Laura J ^a   Blossey, Bernd ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PLANT; SEA;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; OCEANS AND SEAS; PLANTS;

EID: 62549133513     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01192.x     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Able, K. W., S. M. Hagan, and S. A. Brown. 2003. Mechanisms of marsh habitat alteration due to Phragmites: response of young-of-the-year Mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) to treatment for Phragmites removal. Estuaries 26 : 484 494.
2. Beckett, P. M., W. Armstrong, and J. Armstrong. 2001. Mathematical modeling of methane transport by Phragmites: the potential for diffusion within the roots and rhizosphere. Aquatic Botany 69 : 293 312.
3. Benoit, L.K. and R.A. Askins. 1999. Impact of the spread of Phragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes. Wetlands 19 : 194 208.
4. Brix, H., B. K. Sorrell, and B. Lorenzen. 2001. Are Phragmites-dominated wetlands a net source or net sink of greenhouse gases? Aquatic Botany 69 : 313 324.
5. Chambers, R., L. Meyerson, and K. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany 64 : 261 273.
6. Haberl, R., and R. Perfler. 1991. Nutrient removal in a reed bed system. Water Science Technology 23 : 729 737.
7. Hagan, S. M., S. A. Brown, and K. W. Able. 2007. Production of mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus): response in marshes treated for common reed (Phragmites australis) removal. Wetlands 27 : 54 67.
8. Hershner, C., and K. J. Havens. 2008. Managing invasive aquatic plants in a changing system: strategic consideration of ecosystem services. Conservation Biology 22 : 544 550.
9. Julien, M. H., and M. W. Griffiths. 1998. Biological control of weeds. A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. 4th edition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
10. Mal, T. K., and L. Narine. 2004. The biology of Canadian weeds. 129. Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84 : 365 396.
11. Marks M., B. Lapin, and J. Randall. 1994. Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14 : 285 294.
12. Meyerson, L. A., K. Saltonstall, L. Winham, E. Kiviat, and S. Findlay. 2000. A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8 : 89 103.
13. Rooth, J. E., and J. C. Stevenson. 2000. Sediment deposition patterns in Phragmites australis communities: implications for coastal areas threatened by rising sea-level. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8 : 173 183.
14. Rudrappa, T., J. Bonsall, and H. P. Bais. 2007. Root-secreted allelochemical in the noxious weed Phragmites australis deploys a reactive oxygen species response and microtubule assembly disruption to execute rhizotoxicity. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33 : 1898 1918.
15. Talley, T. S., and L. A. Levin. 2001. Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant. Biological Invasions 3 : 51 68.
16. Tewksbury, L., R. Casagrande, B. Blossey, P. Hafliger, and M. Schwarzlander. 2002. Potential for biological control of Phragmites australis in North America. Biological Control 23 : 191 212.