Determination of the attitudes of Turkish infertile women towards surrogacy and oocyte donation

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 36-40

  Kilic, Selim ^a,b   Ucar, Muharrem ^a   Yaren, Hakan ^a   Gulec, Mahir ^b   Atac, Adnan ^a   Demirel, Fatma ^b   Karabulut, Ceren ^b   Demirel, Ozlem ^b  

^a Dept of CBRN Defence ^*

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Gestational surrogacy; Oocyte donation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DISEASE MARKER; EDUCATION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNITY WARD; MOTHER; OOCYTE DONATION; SOCIAL STATUS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

EID: 62549116608     PISSN: 1682024X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baykal B, Korkmaz C, Ceyhan ST, Goktolga U, Baser I. Opinions of infertile Turkish women on gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. Fertil Steril 2008;89(4):817-22.
2. Chang CL. Surrogate motherhood. Formos J Med Humanit 2004;5(12):48-62.
3. Mayeda M. Present state of reproductive medicine in Japan - ethical issues with a focus on those seen in court cases. BMC Med Ethics 2006;5;7:E3
4. Chen KC, Ng HT. Legal and ethical considerations of assisted reproductive technology and surrogate motherhood in AOFOG countries. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001;27(2):89-95.
5. Arbach O. Ethical considerations in Syria regarding reproduction techniques. Med Law 2002;21(2):395-401.
6. Sharma BR. Forensic considerations of surrogacy - an overview. J Clin Forensic Med 2006;13(2):80-5.
7. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data. Fertil Steril 2007;87(6):1301-5.
8. Heng BC. The advent of international 'mail-order' egg donation. BJOG 2006;113(11):1225-7.
9. Isikoglu M, Senol Y, Berkkanoglu M, Ozgur K, Donmez L, Stones-Abbasi A. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: first data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Hum Reprod 2006;21:318-23.
10. Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Bergh T, Lundkvist O. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden. Hum Reprod 2003;18(10):2205-15.
11. Buken N. Assisted reproductive technology and post - menopausal pregnancy regarding the biomedical ethics. High-tech Medicine and the Physician Patient Relationship. Istanbul, 2006;383-93.
12. Schroder AK, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Attitudes toward oocyte donation and surrogate motherhood are strongly influenced by own experiences. Zentralbl Gynakol 2004;126(1):24-31.
13. MacCallum F, Lycett E, Murray C, Jadva V, Golombok S. Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples. Hum Reprod 2003;18(6):1334-42.
14. Chliaoutakis JE, Koukouli S, Papadakaki M. Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy. Hum Reprod 2002;17(11):2995-3002.
15. Westlander G, Janson PO, Tägnfors U, Bergh C. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77(3):317-21.
16. Purewal S, Van Den Akker Ob. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Educ Couns 2006;64(1-3):43-9.
17. Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, Weaver S, Lui S. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 1998;8(4):273-87.