The risk-return paradox for strategic management: disentangling true and spurious effects

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 287-303

  Henkel, Joachim ^a,b  

^a TUM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mean variance; Risk; Risk return paradox; Skewness; Strategy

Indexed keywords

DIELECTRIC LOSSES; RISK PERCEPTION; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EMPIRICAL DATUM; FINANCIAL MARKETS; MEAN-VARIANCE; MEAN-VARIANCE APPROACHES; SKEWNESS; SPURIOUS EFFECTS; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTS; STRATEGY; STRATEGY RESEARCHES;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 62549095955     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.734     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Andersen TJ, Denrell J, Bettis RA. 2007. Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk-return paradox. Strategic Management Journal 28(4): 407-429.
2. Bettis RA, Hall WK. 1982. Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk and accounting determined return. Academy of Management Journal 25: 254-264.
3. Bettis RA, Mahajan V. 1985. Risk/return performance of diversified firms. Management Science 31: 785-799.
4. Bowman EH. 1980. A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Review 21: 17-33.
5. Bowman EH. 1982. Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Review 23: 33-42.
6. Bowman EH. 1984. Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces 14: 61-71.
7. Bromiley P. 1991a. Paradox or at least variance found: a comment on 'mean-variance approaches to risk-return relationships in strategy: paradox lost.' Management Science 37: 1206-1210.
8. Bromiley P. 1991b. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 34: 37-59.
9. Bromiley P, Miller KD, Rau D. 2001. Risk in strategic management research. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS (eds). Blackwell: Maiden, MA: 259-288
10. Chang Y, Thomas H. 1989. The impact of diversification strategy on risk-return performance. Strategic Management Journal 10(3): 271-284.
11. Deephouse DL, Wiseman RM. 2000. Comparing alternative explanations for accounting risk-return relations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 42: 463-482.
12. Denrell J. 2005. Organizational risk taking: learning versus variable risk preferences. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
13. Fiegenbaum A. 1990. Prospect theory and the risk-return association: an empirical examination of 85 industries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 14: 187-203.
14. Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. 1986. Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives on Bowman's risk-return paradox for strategic management: an empirical study. Strategic Management Journal 7(5): 395-407.
15. Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. 1988. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: prospect theory explanations. Academy of Management Journal 31: 85-106.
16. Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. 1990. Prospect theory and the risk-return association: an empirical examination of 85 industries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 14: 187-203.
17. Gooding RZ, Goel S, Wiseman RM. 1996. Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 29: 331-350.
18. Henkel J. 2000. The risk-return fallacy. SchmalenbachBusiness Review 52: 363-373. http://www.fachverlag.de/sbr/pdfarchive/einzelne-pdf/ sbr-2000-oct-363-373.pdf.
19. Jegers M. 1991. Prospect theory and the risk-return relation: some Belgian evidence. Academy of Management Journal 34: 215-225.
20. Jemison DB. 1987. Risk and the relationship among strategy, organizational processes, and performance. Management Science 33: 1087-1101.
21. Johnson HJ. 1992. The relationship between variability, distance from target, and firm size: a test of prospect theory in the commercial banking industry. Journal of Socio-Economics 21: 153-171.
22. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47: 262-291.
23. Kenney JF, Keeping ES. 1951. Mathematics of Statistics, Part 2 (2nd edn). Van Nostrand: Princeton, NJ.
24. Miller KD, Bromiley P. 1990. Strategic risk and corporate performance: an analysis of alternative risk measures. Academy of Management Journal 33: 756-779.
25. Miller KD, Chen W. 2004. Variable organizational risk preferences: tests of the March-Shapira model. Academy of Management Journal 47: 105-115.
26. Miller KD, Leiblein MJ. 1996. Corporate risk-return relations: returns variability versus downside risk. Academy of Management Journal 39: 91-122.
27. Miller KD, Reuer JJ. 1996. Measuring organizational downside risk. Strategic Management Journal 17(9): 671-691.
28. Mood AM, Franklin AG, Boes DC. 1974. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics (3rd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York.
29. Nickel MN, Rodriguez MC. 2002. A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox. Omega 30: 1-18.
30. Oviatt BM, Bauersehmidt AD. 1991. Business risk and return: a test of simultaneous relationships. Management Science 37: 1405-1423.
31. Palmer TB, Wiseman RM. 1999. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: a holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal 20(11): 1037-1062.
32. Ruefli TW. 1990. Mean-variance approaches to riskreturn relationships in strategy: paradox lost. Management Science 36: 368-380.
33. Ruefli TW. 1991. Reply to Bromiley's comment and further results: paradox lost becomes dilemma found. Management Science 37: 1210-1215.
34. Ruefli TW, Collins JM, Lacugna JR. 1999. Risk measures in strategic management research: Auld Lang Syne? Strategic Management Journal 20(2): 167-194.
35. Ruefli TW, Wiggins RR. 1994. When mean square error becomes variance: a comment on 'business risk and return: a test of simultaneous relationships.' Management Science 40: 750-759.
36. Sinha T. 1994. Prospect theory and the risk return association: another look. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 24: 225-231.
37. Walls MR, Dyer JS. 1996. Risk propensity and firm performance: a study of the petroleum exploration industry. Management Science 42: 1004-1021.
38. Wiseman RM, Bromiley P. 1991. Risk-return associations: paradox or artifact? An empirically tested explanation. Strategic Management Journal 12(3): 231-241.