Application of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) for the determination of paleo-wind directions and paleo-environment during the accumulation period of Bag Tephra, Hungary

Quaternary International

Volumn 198, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 77-84

  Bradak B ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DUST; LOESS; MAGNETIC MINERAL; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETITE; PALEOENVIRONMENT; PALEOSOL; PLEISTOCENE; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; WIND DIRECTION;

CARPATHIAN BASIN; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUNGARY;

EID: 62549090666     PISSN: 10406182     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ádám L., Marosi S., and Szilárd J. The loess profile of paks. Geographical Bulletin 2 (1954) 239-254 (in Hungarian)
2. Balsley J.R., and Buddington A.F. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy and fabric of some adirondack granites and orthogneisses. American Journal of Science 258A (1960) 6-20
3. Begét J.E., Stone B.D., and Hawkins B.D. Paleoclimatic forcing of magnetic susceptibility variations in Alaskan loess during the late Quaternary. Geology 18 (1990) 40-43
4. Bulla B. Der pleistozäne löss in Karpathen becken 1-2. Bulletin of Geology 67 196-215 (1937) 289-309 (in German)
5. Bulla B. Der pleistozäne löss in karpathen becken 3. Bulletin of Geology 68 (1938) 33-58 (in German)
6. Cholnoky J. The hydrography of lake Balaton. The Results of the Scientific Study of Lake Balaton 1/2 (1918) 318 (in Hungarian)
7. Derbyshire E., Billard A., Vliet-Lanoe B.V., Lautridou J.P., and Cremaschi M. Loess and paleoenvironment. Some results of a European joint program of research. Journal of Quaternary Science 3 (1988) 147-169
8. Ellwood B.B. Bioturbation; minimal effects on the magnetic fabric of some natural and experimental sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 67 (1984) 367-376
9. Ellwood B.B., and Howard J.H. Magnetic fabric development in an experimentally produced barchan dune. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51 (1981) 97-100
10. Frechen M., Horváth E., and Gábris Gy. Geochronology of middle and upper pleistocene loess sections in Hungary. Quaternary Research 48 (1997) 291-317
11. Fuller M.D. Magnetic anisotropy and paleomagnetism. Journal of Geophysical Research 68 (1963) 293-309
12. Graham J.V. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, an unexploited petrofabric element. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 65 (1954) 1257-1258
13. Granar L. Magnetic measurements on Swedish varved sediments. Arkiv Geofysik 3 (1958) 1-40
14. Hrouda F. Magnetic anisotropy of rock and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophysical Survey 5 (1982) 37-82
15. Horváth E. Marker horizons in the loesses of the Carpathian Basin. Quaternary International 76/77 (2001) 157-163
16. Horváth E., Gábris Gy., and Juvigné E. A marker in the pleistocene of the charpatian basin: the bag tephra. Bulletin of Geology 122/2-4 (1992) 233-249 (in Hungarian)
17. Hrouda F. Magnetic anisotropy of rock and its application in geology and geophysics. Geophysical Survey 5 (1982) 37-82
18. Hus J.J. The magnetic fabric of some loess/paleosol deposits. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28 (2003) 689-699
19. Jámbor A. Pleistocene ventifact occurences in Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica 35 (1992) 407-436
20. Jelinek V. Characterization of magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics 79 (1981) 63-67
21. Kriván P. Die klimatische gliederung des mitteleuropäischen pleistozäns. Acta Geologica Hungarica 3 (1955) 357-383 (in German)
22. Kriván P., and Rózsavölgyi J. The imprint of the upper pleistocene andesite volcanism around the countryside of Aszód. Bulletin of Geology 92/3 (1962) 330-333 (in Hungarian)
23. Kriván P., and Rózsavölgyi J. Andesituff marker horizon of upper pleistocene loess sections in Hungary. Bulletin of Geology 94/2 (1964) 257-265 (in Hungarian)
24. Lagroix F., and Banerjee S.K. Paleowind direction from the magnetic fabric of loess profile in central Alaska. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 195 (2002) 99-102
25. Liu X., Xu T., and Liu T. The Chinese loess in Xifeng, II. A study of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of loess from Xifeng. Geophysical Journal 92 (1988) 349-353
26. Liu B., Saito Y., Yamazaki T., Abdeldayem A., Oda H., Hori K., and Zhao Q. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) characteristics of tidal-influenced sediments in the late pleistocene-Holocene Changjiang incised-valley fill, China. Journal of Coastal Research 21/5 (2005) 1031-1041
27. Lóczy L. The geological phenomena around Lake Balaton. The Results of the Scientific Study of Lake Balaton 1/1/1 (1913) 617 (in Hungarian)
28. Matasova G., Petrovsky E., Jordanova N., Zykina V., and Kapicka A. Magnetic study of late Pleistocene loess/palaeosol section from Siberia: palaeo-environmental implication. Geophysical Journal International 147 (2001) 367-380
29. Nagata T. Rock Magnetism (1961), Maruzen, Tokyo
30. Nawrocki J., Polechońska O., Boguckij A., and Łanczont M. Palaeowind directions recorded in the youngest loess in Poland and western Ukraine as derived from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Boreas 35/2 (2006) 266-271
31. Pécsi M. Genetic classification of the deposit constituting the loess profiles of Hungary. Acta Geologica Hungarica 9 (1965) 65-88
32. Pécsi M. Loess stratigraphy and Quaternary climatic change. Loess inForm 3 (1995) 23-30
33. Pouclet A., Horváth E., Gabris Gy., and Juvigné E. The Bag Tefra, a widespread tephrochronological marker in middle Europa: chemical and mineralogical investigation. Bulletin of Volcanology 60 (1999) 265-272
34. Rees A.I. The use of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in the estimation of sedimentary fabric. Sedimentology 4 (1965) 257-271
35. Rees A.I. The effect of depositional slopes on the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of laboratory deposited sands. Journal of Geology 74 (1966) 856-867
36. Rees A.I., and Woodal W.A. The magnetic fabric of some laboratory-deposited sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 25 (1975) 121-130
37. Rochette P., Jackson M., and Aubourg C. Rock magnetism and the interpretation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility. Reviews of Geophysics 30 3 (1992) 209-226
38. Ruszkiczay-Rüdiger Zs., Fodor L., and Horváth E. Neotectonics and Quaternary landscape evolution of the Gödöllo{combining double acute accent} Hills, central Pannonian Basin, Hungary. Global and Planetary Change, Topo-Europe Special Issue 58/1-4 (2007) 181-196
39. Smalley I.J., and Leach J.A. The origin and distribution of the loess in the Danube basin and associated regions of east-central Europe-a review. Sedimentary Geology 21 (1978) 1-26
40. Szabó J. The influence of ice age in Hungary. Bulletin of Geology 18 (1888) 367-372 (in Hungarian)
41. Tauxe, L., 2005. Lectures in Paleomagnetism. Essayo Press, http://earthref.org/MAGIC/books/Tauxe/2005/.
42. Treitz P. The division of the soils of Hungary based on climate zones. Bulletin of Geology 31 (1901) 353-359 (in Hungarian)
43. Uyeda S., Fuller M.D., Belsché J.C., and Girdler R.W. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks and minerals. Journal of Geophysical Research 68/1 (1963) 279-291
44. Zhu R., Liu Q., and Jackson J.M. Paleoenvironmental significance of the magnetic fabric in Chinese loess-paleosols since the last interglacial (<130 ka). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 221 (2004) 55-69