Introduction: The materiality of printed words and images

Word and Image

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-6

  Larkin, Graham ^a   Pon, Lisa ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62449224715     PISSN: 02666286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02666286.2001.10435698     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ann Bermingham and John Brewer, eds, The Consumption of Culture, 1600-1800: Image, Object, Text (London and New York: Routledge, 1995).
2. P. 87.
3. Bruno Latour, ‘Drawing things together’ in Representation in Scientific Practice, eds Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), pp. 19-68.
4. Jonathan Goldberg, Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990);
5. Hans Ulrich Gumbrccht and K. Ludwig Pfeiffer, eds, Materialities of Communication (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994);
6. Timothy Lenoir, ed., Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998)
7. Margreta De Grazia and Peter Stallybrass, ‘The materiality of the Shakespearean text’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 44 (1993), pp. 255-303, p. 256.
8. Robert W. Scribner, For the Sake of Simple Folk: Popular Propaganda for the German Reformation (Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn 1994);
9. Lisa Pon, ‘Prints and privileges: regulating the image in 16th-century Italy’, Harvard University Art Museums Bulletin, 6/2 (Fall 1998), pp. 40-60.
10. Henri Zemer, ‘What gave connoisseurship its bad name?’, in Drawings Dfined, eds Walter Strauss and Tracie Felker (New York, 1987), pp. 289-90
11. Jerome J. McGann, A Critique of Modem Textual Criticism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).