That's nice ⋯ what can you do with it?

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 111-118

  Belz, Anja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62449207163     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/coli.2009.35.1.111     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen, D., T. Brailsford, R. Bird, and R. Faff. 2003. A review of the research on the past performance of managed funds. ASIC REP 22, Australian Securities and Investment Commission.
2. Belz, A. and A. Gatt. 2008. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic evaluation measures for referring expression generation. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'08), pages 197-200, Columbus, OH.
3. Belz, A. and E. Reiter. 2006. Comparing automatic and human evaluation of NLG systems. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'06), pages 313-320, Trento, Italy.
4. Burstein, J. and M. Wolska. 2003. Toward evaluation of writing style: Overly repetitious word use. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'03), pages 35-42, Budapest.
5. de Garis, H, N. Eiji Nawa, A. Buller, M. Korkin, F. Gers, and M. Hough. 1999. ATR's artificial brain ('CAM-brain') project. In Proceedings of the 1st Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO'99), volume 2, page 1233, Orlando, FL.
6. Engelhardt, P., K. Bailey, and F. Ferreira. 2006. Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54:554-573.
7. Gatt, A., A. Belz, and E. Kow. 2008. The TUNA Challenge 2008: Overview and evaluation results. In Proceedings of the 5th International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG'08), pages 198-206, Salt Fork, OH.
8. Ide, N. and Y. Wilks. 2006. Making sense about sense (Chapter 3). In E. Agirre and P. Edmonds, editors, Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, Berlin, pages 47-74.
9. Jabbari, S., B. Allison, D. Guthrie, and L. Guthrie. 2006. Towards the Orwellian nightmare: Separation of business and personal emails. In Proceedings of the Joint 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLINGACL'06), pages 407-411, Sydney, Australia.
10. Kabadjov, M. A., M. Poesio, and J. Steinberger. 2005. Task-based evaluation of anaphora resolution: The case of summarization. In Proceedings of the RANLP'05 Workshop on Crossing Barriers in Text Summarization Research, pages 18-25, Borovets, Bulgaria.
11. Kilgarriff, A. 1997. "I don't believe in word senses." Computers and the Humanities, 31:91-113.
12. Law, A. S., Y. Freer, I. Hunter, R. H. Logie, N. Mcintosh, and J. Quinn. 2005. A comparison of graphical and textual presentations of time series data to support medical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 19:183-194.
13. Le Fanu, J. 1999. The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine. Abacus, London.
14. Lin, C.-Y. and F. J. Och. 2004. ORANGE: A method for evaluating automatic evaluation metrics for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'04), pages 501-507, Geneva.
15. McCarthy, D. and R. Navigli. 2007. Semeval-2007 Task 10: English lexical substitution task. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval'07), pages 48-53, Prague.
16. Miyao, Y, R. Saetre, K. Sagae, T. Matsuzaki, and J. Tsujii. 2008. Task-oriented evaluation of syntactic parsers and their representations. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of tire Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'OS), pages 46-54, Columbus, OH.
17. Reidsma, D. and R. op den Akker. 2008. Exploiting 'subjective' annotations. In Proceedings of the COLING'08 Workshop on Human Judgements in Computational Linguistics, pages 8-16, Manchester, UK.
18. Reiter, E., S. Sripada, J. Hunter, and J. Yu. 2005. Choosing words in computer-generated weather forecasts. Artificial Intelligence, 167:137-169.
19. Sampson, G. and A. Babarczy. 2003. Limits to annotation precision. In Proceedings of the EACL'03 Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora (LINC'03), pages 61-89, Budapest.
20. Spärck Jones, K. 1981. Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (chapter 12). In K. Spärck Jones, editor, Information Retrieval Experiment. Butterworth & Co, pages 213-255, Newton, MA.
21. Spärck Jones, K. 1994. Towards better NLP system evaluation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (HLT'94), pages 102-107, Plainsboro, NJ.
22. Trang Dang, H. 2006. DUG 2005: Evaluation of question-focused summarization systems. In Proceedings of the COLING-ACL'06 Workshop on Task-Focused Summarization and Question Answering, pages 48-55, Prague.
23. Turian, J., L. Shen, and I. D. Melamed. 2003. Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluation. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX, pages 386-393, New Orleans.