Soil and ground-water remediation techniques

Geoscience Canada

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 22-40

  Beck, Paul ^a  

^a Raven Beck Environmental Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATED SOIL; CONTAMINATION; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION; GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION; REHABILITATION; REMEDIATION; SITE CONDITIONS; SOIL; SOIL REMEDIATION;

EID: 6244267922     PISSN: 03150941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acar, Y.B. and Alshawabkeh, A.N., 1993, Principles of electrokinetic remediation: Environmental Science and Technolology: v. 27, p. 2638-2647.
2. Anderson, T.A., Guthrie, E.A. and Walton, B.T., 1993, Bioremediation in the rhizosphere: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 27 p. 2630-2636.
3. Berezowsky, M., in press, Constructed wetlands for remediation of urban waste waters, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
4. Brox, G.H. and Hanify, D.E., 1989, A new solid/liquid contact bioslurry reactor making bio-remediation more cost-competitive, in Superfund '89, Proceedings of the 10th National Conference, November 27-29, 1989, Washington D.C., p. 371-3.
5. Campbell, M., Campbell, J., McKenna, S., MacRitchie, S. and Diamond, M., in press, Public health and urban soil contamination, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
6. Coakley, J.P. and Mudroch, A., in press, Contaminated sediment in urban Great Lakes waterfronts, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
7. Delthorn, R.T. and Mazzoni, A.F., 1986, Activated carbon, what it is, how it works: Water Technology, v. 9, p. 6-29.
8. Domenico, P.A. and Schwartz, F.W., 1990, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 824 p.
9. Feenstra, S., in press, Chlorinated solvents in urban ground waters, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
10. François, J.-P. and Molyneux, H., in press, Hydrocarbon fuels in urban ground waters and soils, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
11. Hubley, P.J., Panko, A.W. and Boocock, D.W., in press, On-site, ex situ bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils, in Eyles, N., ed., Environmental Geology of Urban Areas: Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, NF, in press.
12. Hughes Environmental Systems Inc., 1992, Steam-enhanced recovery process, in Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition: EPA/540/R-92/077, Nov. 1992, p. 106-7.
13. Jackson, R.F., Fountain, J.C. and Wunderlich, R.W., 1992, Chemically enhanced solubilization of DNAPL: Advancing the state of pump and treat remediation by injection and withdrawal of biodegradable surfactants: International Association of Hydrogeologists, Hamilton, Ontario, May 11-13, 1992, Proceedings, p. 104-116.
14. Lageman, R., 1993, Electroreclamation: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 27, p. 2648-2650.
15. Lehr, J.H., 1991, Granular Activated Carbon (GAC): Everyone knows of it, few understand it: Ground Water Monitoring Review, Fall 1991, p. 5-8.
16. Marley, M.C. and Droste, E.X., 1995, Sparging strips trapped contaminants: International Ground Water Technology, v. 1, p. 18-23.
17. Marley, M.C., Hazebrouck, D. and Walsh, M.T., 1992, The application of in situ air sparging as an innovative soils and groundwater remediation technology: Ground Water Monitoring Review, Spring, p. 137-144.
18. Mercer, J.W., Skipp, D.C. and Giffin, D., 1990, Basics of Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation Technology: U.S. EPA - 600/8-90/003, 31 p.
19. National Research Council, 1993, In Situ Bioremediation - When Does It Work?: National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 207 p.
20. National Research Council, 1994, Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup: National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 315 p.
21. O'Hannesin, S.F. and Gillham, R.W., 1992, A permeable reaction wall for in situ degradation of halogenated organic compounds [abstract]: 45th Canadian Geotechnical Society Conference, Toronto, Ontario, October 25-28, 1992, conference volume, p. 16.
22. Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy (OMOEE), 1994, Ontario's Environmental Technologies Program: Partnerships for a Cleaner Environment, Current Projects, 33 p.
23. aven Beck Environmental Ltd, 1995, Report on demonstration projects for soil and ground water management at Ataratiri: prepared for the Waterfront Regeneration Trust, 42 p.
24. Staps, J.J.M., 1990, International evaluation of in situ biorestoration of contaminated soil and groundwater: National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 192 p.
25. Thomas, D.G. and Mackay, D.M., 1994, Oxygen enhancement of groundwater using a solid oxygen releasing compound [abstract]: Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference, Burlington, Ontario, May 1-3, 1994, Proceedings, p. 12.
26. Udell Technologies, Inc., 1992, In situ steam enhanced extraction, in Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition: EPA/540/R-92/077, Nov. 1992, p. 184-5.
27. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1989, Chemical on-site treatment utilizing KPEG process at Wide Beach, New York, in Demonstration of Remedial Action Technologies for Contaminated Land and Groundwater: NATO/ CCMS Third International Conference, Montreal, Canada, p. 7-36.
28. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1991, Soil Vapour Extraction Technology Reference Handbook: EPA/540/2-91/003, 316 p.
29. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992a, Chemical treatment and Ultrafiltration: Emerging Technology Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/F-92/002.
30. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992b, Membrane filtration: Demonstration Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/MR-92/014,136 p.
31. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992c, Electron beam treatment for removal of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene from streams and sludge: Emerging Technology Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/F-92/009, 51 p.
32. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993a, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition EPA/540/ R-93/526, 231 p.
33. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993b, Hydraulic fracturing technology: applications analysis and technology evaluation report, EPA/540/ R-93/505, 90 p.
34. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993c, A cross-flow pervaporation system for removal of VOCs from contaminated wastewater: Emerging Technology Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/F-93/503, 15 p.
35. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993d, Microfiltration technology: Demonstration Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/MR-93/513, 21 p.
36. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993e, Peroxidation Systems, Inc. perox-pure chemical oxidation technology: Technology Demonstration Summary, SITE Program, EPA/540/SR-93/-501, 6 p.
37. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993f, Destruction of organic contaminants in air using advanced ultraviolet flashlamps: Emerging Technology Summary, SITE Program, EPA/540/ MR-93/520, 10 p.
38. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993g, CAV-OX Ultraviolet Oxidation Process Magnum Water Technology: Demonstration Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/MR-93/520, 18 p.
39. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993h, Electron beam treatment for the removal of benzene and toluene from aqueous streams and sludge: Emerging Technology Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/F-93/502, 22 p.
40. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1993i, Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions using high energy electron beam irradiation: Emerging Technology Bulletin, SITE Program, EPA/540/F-93/509, 123 p.
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1994a, Innovative treatment technologies: Annual Status Report, Sixth Edition EPA 542-R-94-005, 37 p.
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1994b, Eco Logic International Gas Phase chemical reduction process and thermal desorption unit, Middleground Landfill, Bay City, MI: SITE Technology Demonstration Summary, EPA/540/5R-93/522, 8 p.