The SLIP technique, the process dissociation model and multinomial modeling: New tools to experimentally prove freudian slips?;SLIP-technik, prozeßdissoziationsmodell und multinomiale modellierung: Neue werkzeuge zum experimentellen nachweis "freudscher versprecher"?

International Journal of Fracture

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 175-202

  Bröder, Arndt ^a   Bredenkamp, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multinomial modeling; Speech errors; Unconscious processes

Indexed keywords

EID: 6244248379     PISSN: 03769429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baars, B. J. (1980). On Eliciting Predictable Speech Errors in the Laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in Linguistic Performance. Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen, and Hand. (pp. 307-318). New York: Academic Press.
2. Baars, B. J. (1992). A dozen competing-plans-techniques for inducing predictable slips in speech and action. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 129-150). New York: Plenum Press.
3. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T. & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382-391.
4. Bornstein, R. F. & Pittman, T. S . (Eds.). (1992). Perception without awareness. Cognitive, clinical and social perspectives. London: Guilford Press.
5. Broder, A. (1995). Unbewußtes semantisches Priming laborinduzierter Sprechfehler. Eine kombinierte Anwendung der SLIP-Technik und des Prozeßdissoziationsmodells. Bonn: unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit.
6. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E. & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995) Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 2, 137-160.
7. Carroll, D. W. (1986). Psychology of language. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
8. Cohen, A. (1973). Errors of speech and their implication for understanding the strategy of language users. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 88-92). The Hague: Mouton [Original erschienen 1966 in Zeitschrift für Phonetik, 21].
9. Cohen, A. (1973). Errors of speech and their implication for understanding the strategy of language users. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 88-92). The Hague: Mouton [Original erschienen 1966 in Zeitschrift für Phonetik, 21].
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 7-28). Amsterdam: Mouton.
12. Debner, J. A. & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 304-317.
13. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
14. Erdelyi, M. H. (1992). Psychodynamics and the unconscious. American Psychologist, 47, 784-787.
15. Erdfelder, E. & Bredenkamp, J. (1994) . Hypothesenprüfung. In T . Herrmann & W. H. Tack (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, B/I/1, Methodologische Grundlagen der Psychologie (S. 604-648). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
16. Faul, F. & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER; A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [computer program]. Bonn: Psychologisches Institut der Universität Bonn.
17. Ferber, R. (1991). Slips of the tongue or Slips of the ear? On the perception and transcription of naturalistic slips of the tongue. Journal of Psycholinguists Research, 20, 105-122.
18. Freud, S. (1940) . Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. Erster Teil: Die Fehlleistungen. In A. Freud, E. Bibring, E. Kris & O. Isakower (Hrsg.), Sigmund Freud. Gesammelte Werke, chronologisch geordnet (Bd. 11, S. 5-76). London: Imago. [Original erschienen 1917, Leipzig und Wien: Hugo Heller & Cie.].
19. Freud, S. (1954). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer. [Original erschienen 1901 in Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, Bd. 10, Hefte 1 und 2].
20. Freud, S. (1954). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer. [Original erschienen 1901 in Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, Bd. 10, Hefte 1 und 2].
21. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing m sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production. Speech and talk. Vol. 1, (pp. 177-220). London: Academic Press.
22. Graumann, C.-F. (1966). Bewußtsein und Bewußtheit. Probleme und Befunde der psychologischen Bewußtseinsforschung. In W. Metzger (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie in 12 Bänden, Allgemeine Psychologie, I, Der Aufbau des Erkennens, 1. Halbband: Wahrnehmung und Bewußtsein (S. 79-127). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
23. Groeger, J. A. (1984) . Evidence of unconscious semantic processing from a forced error situation. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 305-314.
24. Groeger, J. A. (1986). Preconscious influences on word substitutions. Irish Journal of Psychology, 7, 2, 88-97.
25. Grünbaum, A. (1988). Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse. Eine philosophische Kritik. Stuttgart: Reclam UB. [Übersetzung des amerikanischen Originals The foundations of Psychoanalysis. A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984].
26. Grünbaum, A. (1988). Die Grundlagen der Psychoanalyse. Eine philosophische Kritik. Stuttgart: Reclam UB. [Übersetzung des amerikanischen Originals The foundations of Psychoanalysis. A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984].
27. Hockett, C. F. (1973). Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 93-119). The Hague: Mouton. [Original erschienen 1967 in To honor Roman Jacobson, The Hague: Mouton].
28. Hockett, C. F. (1973). Where the tongue slips, there slip I. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 93-119). The Hague: Mouton. [Original erschienen 1967 in To honor Roman Jacobson, The Hague: Mouton].
29. Hu, X. (1991). Statistical inference program for multinomial binary tree models. Version 1.0 [computer program]. Irvine: University of California.
30. Hu, X. & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
31. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional use of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
32. Jacoby, L. L. & Kelley, C. M. (1992). A process-dissociation framework for investigating unconscious influences: Freudian slips, projective tests, subliminal perception, and signal detection theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 174-179.
33. Jacoby, L. E., Eindsay, D. S., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed. Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist, 47, 802-809.
34. Kihlstrom, J. F., Barnhardt, T. M., & Tataryn, D. J. (1992). The psychological unconscious. Found, lost, and regained. American Psychologist, 47, 788-791.
35. Leuninger, H. (1993). Reden ist Schweigen, Silber ist Gold. Gesammelte Versprecher. Zürich: Ammann.
36. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. Levitt, A. G. & Healy, A. F. (1985). The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 717-733.
38. Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237.
39. Menkle, P. M. (1982). Unconscious perception revisited. Perception & Pschophysics, 31, 298-301.
40. Merikle, P. M. (1992). Perception without awareness. American Psychologist, 47, 792-795.
41. Merikle, P. M. & Reingold, E. M. (1990). Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 574-583.
42. Merikle, P. M. & Reingold, E. M. (1992). Measuring unconscious perceptual processes. In R. F. Bornstein & T S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness. Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 55-80). Eondon: Guilford Press.
43. Meringer, R. & Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen. Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschen.
44. Motley, M. T. (1980). Verification of "Freudian slips" and semantic prearticulatory editing via laboratory-induced spoonerisms. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.) Errors in linguistic performance. Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 133-174). New York: Academic Press.
45. Motley, M. T. & Baars, B. J. (1976). Semantic bias effects on the outcomes of verbal slips. Cognition, 4, 111-187.
46. Motley, M. T. & Baars, B. J. (1979). Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421-432.
47. Ortmann, W. D. (1983). Materialien zur Didaktisierung der Phonemik des Deutschen. Teil 2: Minimalpaare. München: Hueber.
48. Perrig, W., Wippich, W. & Perrig-Chiello, P. (1993). Unbewusste Informationsverarbeitung. Bern: Huber.
49. Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.
50. Riefer, D. M. & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
51. Riefer, D. M. & Batchelder, W. H. (1991). Statistical inference for multinomial processing tree models. In J.-P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: current developments (pp. 313-335). New York: Springer.
52. Schaeder, B. (1979). Maschinenlesbare Text-Corpora des Deutschen und des Englischen. Eine Dokumentation. In H. Bergenholz & B. Schaeder (Hrsg.), Empirische Textwissenschaft. Aufbau und Auswertung von Text-Corpora (S. 325-336). Königstein: Scriptor.
53. Schuttauf, K., Bredenkamp, J. & Specht, E. K. (1995). Induzierte "Freudsche Versprecher" bei zwangsneurotischen und gesunden Probanden. Bonn: unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.
54. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Klatt, D.H. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: evidence from speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 41-55.
55. Stemberger, J. P. (1992) . The reliability and replicability of naturalistic speech error data. A comparison with experimentally induced errors. In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error. Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 195-215). New York: Plenum Press.
56. Tent, J. & Clark, J. E. (1980) . An experimental investigation into the perception of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 317-325.
57. Theodor, E. H. & Mandelcorn, M. S. (1973). Hysterical blindness: a case report and study using a modern psychophysical technique. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 552-553.
58. Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1994). Multinomiale Modellierung impliziter Gedächtnisprozesse: Ein alternativer Ansatz. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 41, 295-314.
59. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight. A case study and its implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Wells, R. (1973). Predicting slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 82-87). The Hague: Mouton. [Original erschienen 1951 in The Yale Scientific Magazine, XXVI]
61. Wells, R. (1973). Predicting slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 82-87). The Hague: Mouton. [Original erschienen 1951 in The Yale Scientific Magazine, XXVI]