Estimation of the amount of suspended sediment in the Tigris River using Artificial Neural Networks

Clean - Soil, Air, Water

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 380-386

  Hamidi, Nizamettin ^a   Kayaalp, Necati ^b  

^a DICLE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Modeling; Neural networks; Regression analysis; Sediment transportation; Tigris River

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVERS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; NONLINEARITY; PARAMETERIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT;

DIYARBAKIR [TURKEY]; EURASIA; TIGRIS RIVER; TURKEY;

EID: 62349106560     PISSN: 18630650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clen.200700094     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. A. Alisik, An application of calculating the total loss of soil (sediment) as a result of erosion in the Tigris Basin, Deserting World and the Sample of Turkey Symposium 7, Center of Environmental Problems, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey 1985, 21.
2. I. B. Uygun, S. R. Köseoǧlu, Water and environmental pollution, Environment, 89 Fifth Scientific and Technical Environment Cong., Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey 1989, 156.
3. H. A. Einstein, A. G. Anderson, J. W. Johnson, A distinction between bed-load and suspended-load in natural streams, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1940.
4. C. F. Nordin, G. R. Dempster, Vertical distribution of velocity and suspended-sediment: middle Rio Grande, U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico, 1963, paper 462-B.
5. H. P. Guy, An analysis of some storm variables affecting stream sediment transport, U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico, 1964, paper 462-E.
6. E. W. Lane, E. J. Carlson, O. S. Hanson, Low temperature increases sediment transportation in the Colorado river, Civil Eng. ASCE 1949, 16.
7. M. Öztürk, E. Gül, Determining the sediment amount in the Peri water basin and comparison of Methods: Proc. of 1 at Water Gong. of Turkey, Cong. Water Bulletins, Istanbul, Turkey 2001, 2, 423.
8. N. Hamidi, Reasons for the pollutions in the Tigris river and determining the changes in pollutions with mathematical models, Ph.D. Thesis, Firat University Institute of Science and Technology, Elazig, Turkey 1994.
9. N. Kayaalp, Determining the sediment loads of Tigris basin rivers with mathematical models, M.Sc. Thesis, Dicle University Institute of Science and Technology, Turkey 2003.
10. ASCE Task Committee, Artificial Neural Networks in hydrology I, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 2000a, 5 (2), 115.
11. ASCE Task Committee, Artificial Neural Networks in hydrology II, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 2000b, 5 (2), 124.
12. S. K. Jain, D. Das, D. K. Srivastava, Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation, ASCE J. Water Resour. Planning Manage. 1999, 125 (5), 263.
13. H. K. Cigizoglu, Application of the generalized regression neural networks to intermittent flow forecasting and estimation, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10 (4), 336.
14. H. K. Cigizoglu, Generalized Regression Neural Network in monthly flow forecasting, Civil Eng. Environ. Syst. 2005, 22 (2), 71.
15. H. K. Cigizoglu, Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multilayer perceptrons, Adv. Water Resour. 2004, 27, 185.
16. H. K. Cigizoglu, Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of flow data by Artificial Neural Networks. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2003, 48 (3), 349.
17. H. K. Cigizoglu, Incorporation of ARMA models into flow forecasting by Artificial Neural Networks, Environmetrics 2003, 14 (4), 417.
18. K. Hsu, H. V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, Artificial Neural Network modeling of rainfall-runoff process, Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31 (10), 2517.
19. J. C. Mason, R. K. Price, A. Tem'me, A Neural Network model of rainfall-runoff using radial basis functions, J. Hydraulic Res. 1996, 34 (4), 537.
20. A. W. Minns, M. J. Hall, Artificial Neural Networks as rainfall-runoff models, Hydrol. Sci. J. 1996, 41 (3), 399.
21. D. A. Fernando, A. W. Jayawerdana, Runoff forecasting using RBF networks with OLS algorithm, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 1998, 3 (3), 203.
22. A. S. Tokar, P. A. Johnson, Rainfall-runoff modeling using Artificial Neural Networks, ASCE J. Hydrol. Eng. 1999, 4 (3), 232.
23. M. Campolo, P. Andreussi, A. Soldati, River flood forecasting with a Neural Network model, Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35 (11), 1191.
24. M. Campolo, P. Andreussi, A. Soldati, Forecasting river flow rate during low-flood periods using Neural Networks, Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35 (11), 3547.
25. S. Ranjithan, J. W. Eheart, J. H. Garrett, Neural Network-based screening for grand water reclamation under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29 (3), 563.
26. L. L. Rogers, F. U. Dowla, Optimization of ground water remediation using Artificial Neural Networks with parallel solute transport modeling, Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30 (2), 457.
27. H. Raman, N. Sunilkumar, Multivariate modeling of water resources time series using Artificial Neural Networks, Hydrol. Sci. J. 1995, 40 (2), 145.
28. H. K. Cigizoglu, Suspended Sediment Estimation And Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks, Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2002, 26 (1), 15.
29. Southeastern Anatolia Region Project, General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI), Etude and Plan Department, Ankara, Turkey, 1980.
30. Monthly temperature and rain values according to long-term averages, Turkish State Meteorological Service (DMI), 2003.
31. 1999 Water Flow Almanac, Electricity Etude Works Presidency (EIE), Ankara, Turkey, 2002, 28.